Poll: multiplayer

[massau]

do you want a larger and more balanced multiplayer even if the singleplayer suffers from it
i mean it is fun to play with mine friends to competitive against each other.
so you can level up and use new weapons.
so doe you think the multiplayer must be larger and better
plz leave a comment

 

[Kellerb]

better multiplayer for worse multiplayer? what? (TYPO!)

 

[Yoshimota]

ummm... yes?

M.A.G looks like it might be ok to play

 

[massau]

better multiplayer for worse multiplayer? what? (TYPO!)

oops sorry i mean multiplayer and the other must be single if you read this it willl be alredy chanced

 

[massau]

k i think that this threat is going to be an EPIC FAIL

 

[Soulgaunt]

........I think you meant thread instead of threat.....
On Topic:It depends on how the single-player would suffer by multi-player.Actually, I'm not sure how single-player would suffer, so if someone could explain.....

 

[Ashbax]

Some guy above said the record is 128, but in BF 2142 I got a hacked match with like 250 guys. it was epic.

on topic: I think the console multiplayer should expand beyond the average 16/18 people maximum, like resistance two where you can have like 62 guys.

 

[Zersy]

do you want a larger and more balanced multiplayer even if the singleplayer suffers from it
i mean it is fun to play with mine friends to competitive against each other.
so you can level up and use new weapons.
so doe you think the multiplayer must be larger and better
plz leave a comment

ummm i think you might need to redo (edit) the thread some bit

like what are you exactly asking ?

 

[massau]

do you want a larger and more balanced multiplayer even if the singleplayer suffers from it
i mean it is fun to play with mine friends to competitive against each other.
so you can level up and use new weapons.
so doe you think the multiplayer must be larger and better
plz leave a comment

ummm i think you might need to redo (edit) the thread some bit

like what are you exactly asking ?

this one http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/9.116534?page=2#2191731 but this one is agains single player so i can test it and know opinions about multiplayer so i know the resoults where right

 

[Vanguard_Ex]

I think I get what you're saying. I would like to see more games with multiplayers like BF 2142 and CoD where you unlock better weapons for higher ranks as a result of kills and stuff. But more on the BF side of things, where you actually choose the weapons you unlock.

Also, 800 posts, woo

 

[meece]

I like good multiplayer and good single player.

If you can only do one however then pick one and do it really, really well.

 

[Tharwen]

It depends on the game.

You buy UT for the multiplayer
You buy XXXX: Total War for the singleplayer (Don't know about empire).
You buy COD X for both.

If a gameplay style is better suited to multiplayer, then yes, I would prefer a better developed multiplayer experience. Otherwise, singleplayer is just fine.

 

[rockingnic]

do you want a larger and more balanced multiplayer even if the singleplayer suffers from it
i mean it is fun to play with mine friends to competitive against each other.
so you can level up and use new weapons.
so doe you think the multiplayer must be larger and better
plz leave a comment

Just from your first sentence (not counting the singleplayer portion) implies that you must be a r-tard (no offense) to say no. Multiplayer is perfect where it is in size for FPSs, nothing over 32 players for a single match or else you just won't feel "special" enough to care about achieveing objectives. I think there should be an increase in RPGs with multiplayer. No, I'm not talking about MMOs because they take commitments and years of gameplay to really accomplish something, I mean something like with Diablo 2, you have single player but then you had multiplayer which was almost the same as single player, just you had buddies to help you. But you should also get a versus mode as well to fight against your friends. Plus it's boring watching your friend trying to beat Fallout 3 or Mass Effect when you want to kick ass too... Size wise, FPS multiplayer size should stay where it is and RPGs should get more multiplayer, weather it's co-op or versus.

 

[Lullabye]

Ther is always room for improvement. In everything.

 

[MetallicaRulez0]

I don't give 2 shits about single-player in FPS games. I really mean that. FPS games were created to allow lonely geeks a place to destroy other lonely geeks and prove their manhood upon the field of battle.

... or something like that.

 

[Lazy Kitty]

Can multiplayer get even bigger? Well, as long as singleplayer doesn't suffer from it.

 

[massau]

do you want a larger and more balanced multiplayer even if the singleplayer suffers from it
i mean it is fun to play with mine friends to competitive against each other.
so you can level up and use new weapons.
so doe you think the multiplayer must be larger and better
plz leave a comment

Just from your first sentence (not counting the singleplayer portion) implies that you must be a r-tard (no offense) to say no. Multiplayer is perfect where it is in size for FPSs, nothing over 32 players for a single match or else you just won't feel "special" enough to care about achieveing objectives. I think there should be an increase in RPGs with multiplayer. No, I'm not talking about MMOs because they take commitments and years of gameplay to really accomplish something, I mean something like with Diablo 2, you have single player but then you had multiplayer which was almost the same as single player, just you had buddies to help you. But you should also get a versus mode as well to fight against your friends. Plus it's boring watching your friend trying to beat Fallout 3 or Mass Effect when you want to kick ass too... Size wise, FPS multiplayer size should stay where it is and RPGs should get more multiplayer, weather it's co-op or versus.

i think co-op is better because it don't affects the singleplayer because you need a campaign to do it