Poll: MvC2 vs MK9
- Thread starter WOPR
- Start date
Recommended Videos
By default, MvC3 because everything about it looks great even if I'm not the biggest MvC fan. MK had a bad bad history with me and it's gonna take some serious stuff to convince me this isn't another pile of fail. So far MK looks promising, nothing special, but it looks decent enough to play and looks like a competent fighter for once. Hell it may be the first MK I'll enjoy, and I'm giving it the benefit of the doubt for now as like I said, it looks decent so far.
If MvC3 is anywhere near as broken and unbalanced as 2 was then I'll avoid it, I hate how cluster fucky it would get. The pacing looks a little slower, and so far I haven't seen anything near as stupid as some of the crap that goes on in 2. Just hope there won't be any team scrub in 3 like there was in 2.
EDIT: and yea what the hell is up with the forums lately? Half the time I poke into a poll thread the poll doesn't work :/
If MvC3 is anywhere near as broken and unbalanced as 2 was then I'll avoid it, I hate how cluster fucky it would get. The pacing looks a little slower, and so far I haven't seen anything near as stupid as some of the crap that goes on in 2. Just hope there won't be any team scrub in 3 like there was in 2.
EDIT: and yea what the hell is up with the forums lately? Half the time I poke into a poll thread the poll doesn't work :/
Ummmm why is the only other option "I hate fighting games....more halos"? That seems a bit trollish.WOPR said:
MvC 3 all the way. MK has only had success for all the wrong reasons and then that only appealed to the 90's "Lol, blood!11" kids. Also, MK doesn't have Amaterasu in it...
Mortal Kombat, has and always will be, shit. As a fighting game.
It is entertaining only as a spectacle, with really shitty fighting mechanics that make me ashamed to have it share the same genre with games like Street Fighter, Blazblue, and Guilty Gear.
It is entertaining only as a spectacle, with really shitty fighting mechanics that make me ashamed to have it share the same genre with games like Street Fighter, Blazblue, and Guilty Gear.
Oh.Onyx Oblivion said:
Oh my.
Sorry to quote you again today, but, no. Just no. I don't agree. At all.
It's different and hard to get used to, sure, but "shit"?
OT: The answer is both. Don't make me decide.
Okay, it's not THAT bad, but compared to the rest of genre, it's just not even close, and is far from deserving of the fame that it has.JourneyThroughHell said:
Fighting games like... Tekken? No, that one hasn't evolved since number 3. Street Fighter? No, I don't think that one is really better, completely different - sure, but, better? BlazBlue? Well, I know nothing of that? Soul Calibur? Hasn't evolved since 2 or something.Durxom said:
So, which games exactly?
Could be true. I don't really like it myself that much.Onyx Oblivion said:
But, I don't think there are that many superior fighting games out there.
I'm going for Mortal Kombat here..it was one of the first fighting games i encountered. Plus Marvel vs Capcom i could just never fully get into to playing.
You know..all of the decent ones people actually play? Casual or Tournament-wise..JourneyThroughHell said:
Marvel Vs. Capcom 2, Soul Calibur 2, SSB, SSBM, SSBB, SSF2T, SF3:3S, Street Fighter 4, Super Street Fighter 4, Tekken 6, Blazblue, Guilty Gear XX, Melty Blood, Tatsunoko Vs. Capcom, Virtua Fighter...just naming a few =S
There's a reason the only copy people play now is Mortal Kombat 3, it was somewhat decent then, but the franchise been trash ever since..
Even though I'm a huge fighter fan, I don't really want MvC that much. But, that said, I am a fighter fan so there's no way I'd vote for MK.