My biggest problem is their standards for "quality of life," i would assume that would be a measure of average income and price indexes, but Newsweek thinks differently. To them, quality of life is:
- income inequlity (apparently when some people make more than others, that's a bad thing)
- gender gap (a valid measure of quality for only half of the population, should be in a "cultural openess" or "cultural freedom" sector instead)
- percentage living on less than $2 per day (measure of extreme poverty, not of the average quality of life)
- comsumption per capita (the best measurement for quality of life they have)
- homicides per 100,000 (ehhhhh, crime is important, but it would be better if they measured overall crime rather than just murders)
- environmental health (useless, Singapore did relatively badly in it because it's a city, as long as a country isn't horribly polluted, then the environment has little to no effect on the quality of life of the average citizen)
- unemployment rate (should be under economic dynamism and should be more long term, short term unemployment shows nothing)