Poll: Of the 3 Lord of the Rings movies which is your favorite?

Glongpre

New member
Jun 11, 2013
1,233
0
0
Gosh, I haven't seen them all in a while now, but my first instinct was to say Fellowship. It followed the book well, and was just generally well done. There weren't many changes from the book that I can remember (taking out Bombadil was a good move). I also like Sean Bean, and his whole character arc was well done. Amon Hen was a great ending.

The other two movies are great, but I felt like some of the changes were meh. I would have loved to see the huorns at the battle of Helm's Deep, and the stuff Erkenbrand was doing. Otherwise, it did a great job because the book was fairly slow, with the company traveling all over the place, and the hobbits meeting the ents and stuff.

Return should have had Aragorns ranger pals instead of the ghosts. That was pretty anticlimactic. It didn't feel earned. Would have been cool to see the scouring of the Shire, but I mean, they gotta keep the movie at a reasonable length, haha. It didn't help the time aspect, that they had to push Shelob to this movie. There was a lot of shit they had to fit in.

Overall, this is a great trilogy. I should watch it again. I'll have to get my friend to join me, because he says he hasn't seen it. Like wtf, how is that even possible?!
 

Faaip

Move Along
Jan 4, 2009
52
0
0
BuildsLegos said:
Faaip said:
BuildsLegos said:
Faaip said:
Yes there are cg effects in Fellowship, but not to the extent of the other two.. that's all I meant. They didn't have the means when the first was filmed and had to use it more sparingly.
The entire 12-hour trilogy was filled as a single project between 1998 and 2001. And as with all single projects, the CGI was done entirely after filming. At no point was CGI used when it wasn't needed, unless you want to count the option of looking like ass. (Case in point, any Gollum cosplay.)
That's not really the point I was making.. I just said Fellowship used it the least.
Bullshit, you said "had to use it more sparingly" (compared to later LotR, not Hobbit) because they "didn't have the means". What you mean is meaningless when what you say is wrong.
Jesus dude I wasn't trying to start a fight.. but if you really want to split hairs, LoTR was meant to be a two part series where the first part ended with the battle at Helm's Deep. Even after splitting it into three, the other parts would have gone to video if the first wasn't successful. It was only the success of the first that allowed the production to do reshoots for the next two parts to finish them up. They were not finished at the same time and much of the digital effect work for Return of the King was done in 2002.

I don't feel like arguing.. I'm not anti-cgi, but Fellowship has less.. its my favorite of the three for many reasons
 

Faaip

Move Along
Jan 4, 2009
52
0
0
BuildsLegos said:
I apologize for my ignorance to reshoots, but I can't imagine a year or 2 making that big of a difference. I still stand by what I said earlier about minimal CGI use; I'd still bet that all reshoots were for better performances and maybe props. At any rate, I'm also sorry for getting angry.
No problem man! I'm not certain of the extent of the reshoots.. I knew they did a lot before the films were finished, but some of that is based on interviews I've read where it was claimed that the second and third films were a lot less complete than PJ would admit to. I guess we'll never know for sure, and you're right that Two Towers and Return of the King had more call for cgi use than Fellowship due to the larger scale set pieces and battles.

You can do a lot of shooting in a short amount of time though. Raiders of the Lost Ark was filmed in only 75 days! This stuff just interests me.. but we're all LoTR fans here :D
 

RedDeadFred

Illusions, Michael!
May 13, 2009
4,896
0
0
All three of the movies are among my favourites of all time, but I'd have to go with Fellowship. The Ringwraiths were genuinely terrifying to the point where I felt like I was watching a horror movie the first time. The entirety of the Mines of Moria section is amazing. Boromir's last, redeeming stand is my second favourite scene in the trilogy. However....
Sonmi said:

That being said, my favourite moment of the whole trilogy is by far Theoden's speech and charge in The Return of the King, it always gives me shivers.
I agree. It's the best scene in the trilogy. Goosebumps every time.

Edit: although that extended bit still pisses me off. Gandalf and the Witch King never face each other in the books (apart from Gandalf holding off all 9 of the Ringwraiths before escaping at Weathertop) and it's always bugged me that Jackson decided to have the duel be so one-sided. This is after he beat the Balrog and became more powerful.
 

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 4, 2014
9,651
2,177
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
RedDeadFred said:
Edit: although that extended bit still pisses me off. Gandalf and the Witch King never face each other in the books (apart from Gandalf holding off all 9 of the Ringwraiths before escaping at Weathertop)
Um, they do, after the gate is breached. The Witch King takes the lead, only Gandalf doesn't flee, but it's at this point that the horns of Rohan are heard. The dialogue in the film duel is taken from the book scene, but the actual fight doesn't happen in the books.
 

Ravinoff

Elite Member
Legacy
May 31, 2012
316
35
33
Country
Canada
Sonmi said:

That being said, my favourite moment of the whole trilogy is by far Theoden's speech and charge in The Return of the King, it always gives me shivers.
Ffffffuck yeah, ROTK is probably my favorite just for that scene (though the Last March Of The Ents is a close second).

"Spears shall be shaken, shields shall be splintered! A sword day...a red day...ere the sun rises! Ride now!...Ride! Ride to ruin and the world's ending!"

That, and the scene where Eowyn puts a sword through the Witch-King's face, that gives me chills as well.

I'll admit that ROTK probably wasn't the best movie, the parts with Frodo and Sam are painful and really kill the pacing, and my memory of the ending kinda cuts out after Gollum falls into Mount Doom and the orcs are routed at the Black Gate, but to be honest, I watch LOTR for the battles, not the story of the Ring.
 

RedDeadFred

Illusions, Michael!
May 13, 2009
4,896
0
0
Hawki said:
RedDeadFred said:
Edit: although that extended bit still pisses me off. Gandalf and the Witch King never face each other in the books (apart from Gandalf holding off all 9 of the Ringwraiths before escaping at Weathertop)
Um, they do, after the gate is breached. The Witch King takes the lead, only Gandalf doesn't flee, but it's at this point that the horns of Rohan are heard. The dialogue in the film duel is taken from the book scene, but the actual fight doesn't happen in the books.
To clarify, by face each other, I meant actually fight. Kinda like how a face-off in hockey involves the players actually clashing rather than simply saying "hi." I realize they do meet, but the whole staff destruction, getting laid out, and then having him cower in fear is what annoyed me.
 

Johnny Novgorod

Bebop Man
Legacy
Feb 9, 2012
19,238
3,817
118
Hawki said:
Johnny Novgorod said:
and then pretending like Haldir's death (the guy you met 5 minutes before and isn't even there in the book) is the worst thing ever.
I don't think it's trying to sell Haldir's death as particuarly tragic, Haldir is just the 'face' of the death of the elves. It's why I feel the presence of the elves works in the film. In addition to the eye candy that the elves provide (in that we see how 'kewl' they are in bowplay), it's the 'passing of the elves' conveyed as a microcosm, and Haldir's last moments encapsulate it. The elves are past their time. The elves can't stand before the power Saruman has created, let alone Sauron. The very design of their armour, and how it contrasts with the Noldor at the start of Fellowship, even adds to this. So, it's not so much that Haldir's death is tragic, it's that it's symbolic of how the war will play out from here, that it will be Men who decide the fate of Middle-earth, not the elves, whose time has ended.
This would be a good argument if the movie didn't also have Elf Legolas absolutely owning Helm's Deep. The whole time-of-the-elves-is-past deal is basically reduced to Arwen's scenes of languor. The way Two Towers plays out, there're no meaningful deaths to give the movie an added sense of drama or danger (like Fellowship or Return), so they made up that totally irrelevant fake out with Aragorn and then what's his name's death.
 

Frankster

Space Ace
Mar 13, 2009
2,507
0
0
All things considered..I find myself surprised to say i think 1st is the strongest and most enjoyable film.

I'm surprised because it's the one with no big battles, but maybe that's why i remember the film more fondly, it was about the fellowship and their travels and the story tighter and more intimate.

And i guess despite the masses involved..I don't feel like any of the later films big battles comes close to matching smaller scale skirmishes like Boromir's last stand. Orcs then felt more like an actual threat and something to be feared, in the later films you wonder how a single non hobbit member of the fellowship could ever struggle against just a few dozen orcs, guess Boromir was a noob.

Finally the more I think about the first film, the more I remember how suspenseful it was a lot of the time. In particular i remember the ringwraiths and how they were genuinely intimidating enforcers hunting the ringer bearer at every turn like a group of fantasy t-1000s and making for some :S moments when they came close to their goal. They never were quite the same in the sequels.
 

Hawki

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 4, 2014
9,651
2,177
118
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Johnny Novgorod said:
This would be a good argument if the movie didn't also have Elf Legolas absolutely owning Helm's Deep.
Legolas happens to be an elf, but he's far more tied in with the Fellowship at this point in time. His actions are in the same league as Arragorn and Gimli, his being an elf isn't related to them. Haldir, on the other hand, is tied purely with the elves. Something I didn't mention up above is that the camera spends as much time on the bodies of the elves as Haldir in particular.

Johnny Novgorod said:
The whole time-of-the-elves-is-past deal is basically reduced to Arwen's scenes of languor.
If you're referring to just the Two Towers, that's false, it's brought up in the Galadriel/Elrond scenes in addition to Arwen. If referring to the whole trilogy, it's likewise false, as it's brought up as early as when Frodo and Sam see the Wood Elf caravan.

Johnny Novgorod said:
The way Two Towers plays out, there're no meaningful deaths to give the movie an added sense of drama or danger (like Fellowship or Return), so they made up that totally irrelevant fake out with Aragorn and then what's his name's death.
Few points:

-Theodred dies early on, and it's very relavent. It's the catalyst for establishing Grima's infatuation with Eowyn and adds to her sense of loneliness, it partially spurs Eomer's banishment, and it's a double whammy for Theoden in that not only has he lost his son, but also his only heir. Theodred as a character isn't that important, but his role separate from his character is very relevant.

-I'd say that Haldir's death is relevant in of itself, for the reasons described up above. Hama also dies. I'm not saying that particular death is impactful, but if the basis of a work of fiction's impact is based on how many people die, then the Two Towers does have that in spades, given how many men and elves fall at Helm's Deep, and in the Dunlandings' rampage across Rohan. Fellowship is more intimate in its deaths (Gandalf, Boromir), but Two Towers has its share of consequence.

-I wouldn't call Arragorn's fake-out irrelevant. The sequence of events does reinforce his bond with Arwen, acts as the catalyst for him catching sight of Saruman's army army, does add to his character in that he keeps pushing himself after getting to Helm's Deep (e.g. the "you're no good to us half dead" line), and arguably does add to the bond between him and Eowyn, even if it's only platonic on his part. I wouldn't be counting on the fake-out to fool many people, but it does directly impact the plot and character interactions.

Frankster said:
And i guess despite the masses involved..I don't feel like any of the later films big battles comes close to matching smaller scale skirmishes like Boromir's last stand. Orcs then felt more like an actual threat and something to be feared, in the later films you wonder how a single non hobbit member of the fellowship could ever struggle against just a few dozen orcs, guess Boromir was a noob.
Someting to consider is that Boromir is fighting on his own against uruk-hai, which are far better than your average orc, and while I don't think the film states it, it's at least implied in supplementary materials that Lurtz's band were an elite scouting force, while the uruk-hai we see later are the equivalent of grunts. Likewise, Boromir is fighting on his lonesome, while in every battle after Amon Hen, the members of the Fellowship are with other warriors. So, no, I don't think it sells Boromir short that he dies, if anything, it adds to his death that despite fighting all alone bar some hobbits, against such creatures, he does as well as he does.

Frankster said:
Finally the more I think about the first film, the more I remember how suspenseful it was a lot of the time. In particular i remember the ringwraiths and how they were genuinely intimidating enforcers hunting the ringer bearer at every turn like a group of fantasy t-1000s and making for some :S moments when they came close to their goal. They never were quite the same in the sequels.
While the Ringwraiths are at their most intimidating in Fellowship, I'd argue that they still retain a measure of said intimidation, especially in Return of the King. How their screeches are enough to paralyze Gondorian soldiers with fear, while also knocking out the trebuchets. So, on one hand, it symbolizes their roles as terror soldiers, while also emphasizing how unlike in the Last Alliance, Sauron's armies are far more coordinated.
 

Nazulu

They will not take our Fluids
Jun 5, 2008
6,242
0
0
Huh. I remember I made this thread and the votes were the other way around.

Yeah, Followship is still my favourite as it was then. I feel the tone is more focused with just the one group, and the atmosphere is thicker due to the more interesting use of lighting, colour, shots/angles and editing. I also see it as more of an adventure than the other 2, feeling more intense in general. And as awesome as those massive battle scenes are in TT and RotK, I still believe the Balrog scenes are the most incredible. I agree with Mahorfeus that it loses too much steam after that moment, which is a shame, but it just picked up enough for me after they left the Elven forest kingdom thingy.
 

springheeljack

Red in Tooth and Claw
May 6, 2010
645
0
0
I love all the Lord of the Ring movies but the second is still my favorite because I think it just built off what made the first one so great.