In 2008 the world sat and watched Iron Man. It was a smash hit that would go on to make super hero movies a cottage industry, and would produce one of the most lucrative film companies in history. Hulk followed shortly after, and eventually we got Captain America, Thor, Dr. Strange, and even fucking Antman. Even their worst received films are generally seen as crowd pleasers.
Prior to this, however, Marvel had to work through third party film companies. Many of their biggest IP's are still in the hands of other companies. Prior to 2008 we got the Sam Reimi spiderman movies, the original X-men movies, a Fantastic Four film, and a Hulk movie. Many of these films helped legitimize superheroes to mainstream audiences.
While re-watching the old spider man and X-men movies, I was surprised by how well they held up. I thought the writing and cosmetics were much better then the average super hero film released today. Of course, I then remembered that there were some stinkers from that era as well. There seemed to be a sharp divide in tone between old super hero movies and post iron man/marvel superhero movies. My question is, which do you think was better overall?
Prior to this, however, Marvel had to work through third party film companies. Many of their biggest IP's are still in the hands of other companies. Prior to 2008 we got the Sam Reimi spiderman movies, the original X-men movies, a Fantastic Four film, and a Hulk movie. Many of these films helped legitimize superheroes to mainstream audiences.
While re-watching the old spider man and X-men movies, I was surprised by how well they held up. I thought the writing and cosmetics were much better then the average super hero film released today. Of course, I then remembered that there were some stinkers from that era as well. There seemed to be a sharp divide in tone between old super hero movies and post iron man/marvel superhero movies. My question is, which do you think was better overall?