tkioz said:
Lots of languages are dying off, you just need to like at the UK and the huge amounts of money they are spending to "save" languages like Gaelic and Welsh (?) to see that, but do you think we're moving towards a single one world language and would that be a good thing?
If so, which language should / will it be? Mandarin and Cantonese are both spoken by a lot of people, but then you've got English which is pretty much the de facto "lingua franca" (and isn't that a funny phrase when used in this context) of the business and digital world at the moment.
Or should we develop an artificial language like Esperanto (only you know better...)?
Um Op, are you ok?
First, why would hindi mandarin and japanese be up there? All three are confusing languages that have not been refined to base characters (like english and french, spanish latin/ greek based languages have) Though hindi would be the best out of those three, it is still way too illogical and hard to learn for it to be a world language.
Second, You put up French... why? who speaks French...? and who speaks Spanish? Compare, and you will see that there are a half a billion native speakers in Spanish, hundreds of times greater than that of French, even with non native speakers. There is no reason for French to be up there.
Third, while english is the current "lingua franca" it is not a very efficient and easy language to learn compared to others like Spanish, and Latin. I can see why you put that up there though.
Fourth, and final, Why, for the sake of all things logical and intelligent, did you NOT put up Latin.
Latin is the supreme of all languages on earth, by far the easiest and best for all mankind. This language can be easily picked up by all speakers of indo-european languages, and be more easily picked up by people who speak mandarin and Cantonese.