Just a quick question: why does this game have a reputation as being dumbed down for consoles? I picked up a copy of the DS version today (thank you K-mart for putting your DS games on clearance to make room for 3DS games; $10 was a great price for this), and I have to say, I'm enjoying it so far. It seems like Civ I with redone graphics and a few innovations from Civ II, which is just awesome for a DS game. I've seen a lot of people saying that it was dumbed down for consoles, and that if it's the only civ game you've played, then you haven't played a real one, but that doesn't seem to be the case to me.
Also, there's a poll; let's see who enjoyed it and who didn't, just for the heck of it.
Also, there's a poll; let's see who enjoyed it and who didn't, just for the heck of it.