Ah. So it's not just me...The King of Rock and Roll said:Yeah most of it was satire that got reported because people took it seriously.
Ah. So it's not just me...The King of Rock and Roll said:Yeah most of it was satire that got reported because people took it seriously.
So just now you didn't regret not putting that in your original post as an edit? You don't regret double posting for no reason whatsoever?molesgallus said:I regret a lot of things in my life. But a forum post? I couldn't regret something so meaningless.
No. My other post was a response to someone else's post. My point wasn't related. I didn't even know double posting was considered 'wrong'. If it is, then I would have a lot to regret; if it was worth regretting it. Which it isn't, because there are no negative repercussions.s0denone said:So just now you didn't regret not putting that in your original post as an edit? You don't regret double posting for no reason whatsoever?molesgallus said:I regret a lot of things in my life. But a forum post? I couldn't regret something so meaningless.
If not, I'd say you're a little ill suited for the forums, bearing in mind that the general consensus is that one should abide by "Forum Law", also known as the "Code of the Fool".
You seem incredibly eager to underline that you have no regrets because the Internet doesn't matter. I share your opinion, but maybe you should tone it down a little... It smells like overcompensating.molesgallus said:No. My other post was a response to someone else's post. My point wasn't related. I didn't even know double posting was considered 'wrong'. If it is, then I would have a lot to regret; if it was worth regretting it. Which it isn't, because there are no negative repercussions.s0denone said:So just now you didn't regret not putting that in your original post as an edit? You don't regret double posting for no reason whatsoever?molesgallus said:I regret a lot of things in my life. But a forum post? I couldn't regret something so meaningless.
If not, I'd say you're a little ill suited for the forums, bearing in mind that the general consensus is that one should abide by "Forum Law", also known as the "Code of the Fool".
Overcompensating what?s0denone said:You seem incredibly eager to underline that you have no regrets because the Internet doesn't matter. I share your opinion, but maybe you should tone it down a little... It smells like overcompensating.molesgallus said:No. My other post was a response to someone else's post. My point wasn't related. I didn't even know double posting was considered 'wrong'. If it is, then I would have a lot to regret; if it was worth regretting it. Which it isn't, because there are no negative repercussions.s0denone said:So just now you didn't regret not putting that in your original post as an edit? You don't regret double posting for no reason whatsoever?molesgallus said:I regret a lot of things in my life. But a forum post? I couldn't regret something so meaningless.
If not, I'd say you're a little ill suited for the forums, bearing in mind that the general consensus is that one should abide by "Forum Law", also known as the "Code of the Fool".
How can you not know double posting is considered silly, when there's an "EDIT" button right below your own posts? What you did was not "wrong", but simply "stupid". I mean, you wrote two posts barely containing two sentences when put together, instead of the editing the first to shove in that extra "And also, on topic: [...]".
I love you for that.WINDOWCLEAN2 said:I feel this is somehow appropriate:
Dear Humanity, We regret Being Alien Bastards.
We regret Coming to Earth.
And we most DEFINATLEY Regret the Corps just blew OUR RAGGEDY ASS FLEET!
(Hoorah)