THIS IS NOT CRUISE CONTROL, I'M ACTUALLY PISSED, AND AM ACTUALLY HOLDING THE SHIFT KEY.
Ok, sorry for that. I have a question... a quandary... a quick quizzical quibble about questions themselves. Particularly the fabled "rhetorical" species of question.
If someone asks a rhetorical question, they can do it for several reasons; They may be doing it to shed light on a question that they feel you should ponder for the shear pleasure of postulation, or they might be using the question to highlight the stupidity of someone else. Of course i'm sure there are other reasons, but I'll be talking about the latter of the two i listed.
If a person asks a rhetorical question that is meant to tear down another person and make them look stupid (see "strawman argument [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man]") and you know the simple and easy explanation that would both restore the other persons honor, and inform and educate the obviously ignorant (not an insult [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ignorant]) person, is it your duty to engage this situation and at least try? Or should you leave well enough alone being that it was a rhetorical question?
Your opinions on this matter and any other part of this rhetorical nonsense are much appreciated.
Ok, sorry for that. I have a question... a quandary... a quick quizzical quibble about questions themselves. Particularly the fabled "rhetorical" species of question.
If someone asks a rhetorical question, they can do it for several reasons; They may be doing it to shed light on a question that they feel you should ponder for the shear pleasure of postulation, or they might be using the question to highlight the stupidity of someone else. Of course i'm sure there are other reasons, but I'll be talking about the latter of the two i listed.
If a person asks a rhetorical question that is meant to tear down another person and make them look stupid (see "strawman argument [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man]") and you know the simple and easy explanation that would both restore the other persons honor, and inform and educate the obviously ignorant (not an insult [http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ignorant]) person, is it your duty to engage this situation and at least try? Or should you leave well enough alone being that it was a rhetorical question?
Your opinions on this matter and any other part of this rhetorical nonsense are much appreciated.