In my sociology class today, our teacher proposed this question on Conditioning: Is it better to reward positive actions, or to prevent undesirable actions through punishment?
There are two ways to look at this. For Rewarding good behaviour, it might seem more reasonable to assume this is the better action. But humans are not stupid, we would quickly find a way to manipulate the rewards system for our own benefit, negating the conditioning altogether. This leads to corruption and manipulation.
Punishment acts as a way to prevent an undesirable action, through fear and intimidation. This can have dangerous consequences. It prevents the undesired action, but does not allude to the alternative action which is desired. It also gives the conditioner control over the person, as they dictate what is acceptable and what isn't.
So, manipulation of rewards has the potential to corrupt, while punishment gives one person power over another.
What do you think is the better answer?
There are two ways to look at this. For Rewarding good behaviour, it might seem more reasonable to assume this is the better action. But humans are not stupid, we would quickly find a way to manipulate the rewards system for our own benefit, negating the conditioning altogether. This leads to corruption and manipulation.
Punishment acts as a way to prevent an undesirable action, through fear and intimidation. This can have dangerous consequences. It prevents the undesired action, but does not allude to the alternative action which is desired. It also gives the conditioner control over the person, as they dictate what is acceptable and what isn't.
So, manipulation of rewards has the potential to corrupt, while punishment gives one person power over another.
What do you think is the better answer?