Poll: Shakespeare, your thoughts?

Recommended Videos

Legion

Were it so easy
Oct 2, 2008
7,186
0
0
Sewblon said:
I am not into poetry but I appreciate his work. You have to remember that he wrote plays, they were meant to be seen.
This. Reading his plays in class were horrible; Seeing one of his Comedies performed by a decent set of actors is definitely worth a watch.
 

The Iron Ninja

New member
Aug 13, 2008
2,868
0
0
He's pretty good I guess.

I get bored trying to read his work, due to the fact that it's hard to tell what he's getting at sometimes due to how different the english language was about four hundred years ago. Pretty clever sod all things considered though. Could make a joke or two from what I've gathered.
 

justnotcricket

Echappe, retire, sous sus PANIC!
Apr 24, 2008
1,205
0
0
GRoXERs said:
Diff'rent strokes for diff'rent folks, I guess, but personally I think Shakespeare is fantastic.

Iago is my favorite character ever, in anything, because he's such a breathtakingly magnificent bastard.
I have to agree, on both counts =) Othello is my favourite of his plays, and 116 my favourite sonnet, but I like most of his works. He can take some getting into, but if you take the time to explore his language, the rewards are great indeed. =)
 

Steve Dark

New member
Oct 23, 2008
468
0
0
Machines Are Us said:
Sewblon said:
I am not into poetry but I appreciate his work. You have to remember that he wrote plays, they were meant to be seen.
This. Reading his plays in class were horrible; Seeing one of his Comedies performed by a decent set of actors is definitely worth a watch.
This again. Reading the same soliloquy over and over in secondary school was god damn awful boring. Watching David Tennant and Patrick Stuart perform Hamlet from the front row however, another matter ENTIRELY.
 

Silva

New member
Apr 13, 2009
1,122
0
0
I am a writer myself, and to not acknowledge Shakespeare's genius would be foolish. His plays weren't just dirty jokes for working class people; they had amazing philosophical insights which many philosophers still quote him for. King Lear and Hamlet were both particularly amazing in that way.

Another thing that speaks for Shakespeare is his incredible ability to do more than one genre well. He could do fantasy (Midsummer Night's Dream), historical dramatisation (Macbeth), court drama, tragedy and comedy.

What's more, his plays showed a passing knowledge of other parts of life, for example, the medicine systems of the time, the predictive and psychological systems of astrology, astronomy, and other sciences.

He wasn't a Jack of All Trades - he was a Master of Several. And that's probably still underestimating him.

Steve Dark said:
This again. Reading the same soliloquy over and over in secondary school was god damn awful boring. Watching David Tennant and Patrick Stuart perform Hamlet from the front row however, another matter ENTIRELY.
David Tennant doing Hamlet... my God that would be good. Somehow I just find him perfect for any role in that play.
 

edinflames

New member
Dec 21, 2007
378
0
0
Steve Dark said:
Machines Are Us said:
Sewblon said:
I am not into poetry but I appreciate his work. You have to remember that he wrote plays, they were meant to be seen.
This. Reading his plays in class were horrible; Seeing one of his Comedies performed by a decent set of actors is definitely worth a watch.
This again. Reading the same soliloquy over and over in secondary school was god damn awful boring. Watching David Tennant and Patrick Stuart perform Hamlet from the front row however, another matter ENTIRELY.
I am so jealous of you.

I have seen Sean Bean as Macbeth (with Samantha Bond as Lady Macbeth) and that was outstanding.

Othello is another good play - just love the tragedies.

But yeah, Shakespeare must be seen as performance to be fully appreciated.
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,429
0
0
"Nothing in his life became him like the leaving it; he died as one that had been studied in his death to throw away the dearest thing he owed, as 't were a careless trifle" - Macbeth
 

Captain Blackout

New member
Feb 17, 2009
1,056
0
0
The positive votes outnumber the negatives by just over 2 to 1 at the moment. That ought to say something.
Slamming Shakespeare is a little like ripping on Mozart. You may not like his work but that doesn't change the fact that he was incredibly talented for his time and his plots hold up exceptionally well even today. Complaining that he's too hard to understand isn't a complaint. Learn the language or let it go. I can certainly understand having a hate on for the guy because you don't like his work and have to study him. Blame an un-integrated educational system. I got everything I needed from Shakespeare in one class and had the option of taking a different literature class to fulfill the requirement.

Not that I'm a fanboy or anything. No, really...
 

RAWKSTAR

New member
Jun 5, 2008
1,498
0
0
After studying his work for my Alevels Shakespeare can fuck right off.
He was ALRIGHT. Nothing more, nothing less.
 

Space Spoons

New member
Aug 21, 2008
3,334
0
0
I enjoy and appreciate the man's work when I see it acted out, as it was intended to be. On paper, I always found it kind of impenetrable.
 

FROGGEman2

Queen of France
Mar 14, 2009
1,629
0
0
The main reason that people don't like him is because they don't understand his writing style. Until one can completely understand Shakespearian, please know that we completely disregard your hate-statements and you should all go fucking die because you are a plague to our earth. I HAAAAATE YOOOOOOU!
 

Harlemura

Ace Defective
May 1, 2009
3,324
0
0
I really, really don't like him.
It's probably because, as people are saying, I'm forced to not only read his stuff, but to analyze things like "How does this person saying something to that person result in this person doing blah de blah de blah."
 

CakeDragon

New member
Mar 10, 2009
566
0
0
His work is really good, and I guess in its' time it was a literary genius... I just don't understand what the flip he goes on about sometimes.
 

Skeleon

New member
Nov 2, 2007
5,409
0
0
To be honest, I read only one of his works, so my opinion may not be valid.
However, we read Macbeth in English in school and I found it to be totally awesome!
I love Victorian English and the story itself was great: Lies, murder, ghosts, it had everything.
So, from my limited experience with Shakespeare, I'd say, yes, he's a literary genius.
 

kingcom

New member
Jan 14, 2009
867
0
0
The context of his work is obvious outdated and unrecognised but the messages are still rather insightful.
 

The_Deleted

New member
Aug 28, 2008
2,188
0
0
Titus Andronicus is of the most powerful plays ever written. Makes MacBeth look like an episode of Hollyoakes.
If you get the chance then look for the Anthony Hopkins film. Fan-bastard-tastic.
 
Mar 17, 2009
4,094
0
0
The_Deleted said:
If you get the chance then look for the Anthony Hopkins film. Fan-bastard-tastic.
"Othello" with Anthony Hopkins as Othello and Bob Hoskins as Iago? I saw that, it was fan-fucking-tastic!
 

Lullabye

New member
Oct 23, 2008
4,424
0
0
by todays standards he's good, in his time he was probably a literary god. but we have had better since. I liked romeo and juliet, but macbeth was almost painful to read, it was so morbid and dark and the humor(if you can call it that) was just.....awful. ugh...