Ok so, ever heard of a rating company (EG, PEGI, ERSB, etc) that has been putting pressure on a game developer because they consider a game to be "too inappropriate" somehow to be released?
I've been hearing that more and more as new idea's for games are being announced and I'm starting to wonder if this should be allowed? I mean no one cracked down on the works of Shakespeare or H.P Lovecraft, and for a good reason.
No one told Picaso or Van Gogh that they couldn't show their paintings,
I could go on and on with examples.
Bottom of the line, if a development team works on a game, should they have to cut out parts to appease the raters?
(my personal opinion, no, if a game is overly violent, gory or contains sexual scenes, then there are ways of pointing that out to a customer before its paid for. If a game contains things that you may be offended by, then no one is forcing you to play it, don't ruin it for everyone else)
I've been hearing that more and more as new idea's for games are being announced and I'm starting to wonder if this should be allowed? I mean no one cracked down on the works of Shakespeare or H.P Lovecraft, and for a good reason.
No one told Picaso or Van Gogh that they couldn't show their paintings,
I could go on and on with examples.
Bottom of the line, if a development team works on a game, should they have to cut out parts to appease the raters?
(my personal opinion, no, if a game is overly violent, gory or contains sexual scenes, then there are ways of pointing that out to a customer before its paid for. If a game contains things that you may be offended by, then no one is forcing you to play it, don't ruin it for everyone else)