Fusioncode9 said:
After the atrocity that was Fallout New Vegas, I'm never buying a Bethesda game at launch again. I'll wait a month or two and the purchase it, since by then all the game breaking bugs should be gone.
i am pretty sure new vegas was developed by obsidian, but published by bethesda. sort of the way bioware made mass effect 2, but ea published it. the buggy nature of new vegas seems to have been obsidian's fault.
as for skyrim, i am so torn about that game.
i dont like oblivion. it has a broken, utterly aweful levelling system. painfully boring slow and graphically unimpressive combat (i am 33 years old and have already played hexen once, i dont want to do it again!), and down right repuslive graphics a lot of the time. i have been playing through it for the first time recently, and have put a couple dozen hours into it off and on so far. there is a lot of recommend it, but that completely broken, shockingly aweful levelling system just sucks all the life out of it. i can not emphasize enough how mind bogglingly aweful that system is.
i like open world adventure games. i direct my gaze to my games' shelves and see things like fallout 3, new vegas, red dead redemption, borderlands, deus ex (kind of open world), farcry 2, dead rising (not actually a good game, too many broken design issues), dead rising 2 (cant seem to get into it though), GTA4, etc, etc, etc... is skyrim going to top the ones in that list that are good? would i be better served just replaying one of the other ones i like?
ps. seriously, how can anyone say oblivion was good when it had that levelling system!