Greyfox105 said:
Shall we ban grenade launchers in real life also?
People wanted a realistic (Ha, yeah right) modern warfare game. If real life has grenade launchers, then the players just have to suck up the consequences. They begged for it, so it is their own fault, in a way.
You want real guns in games, have to deal with them yourself. I no longer play Call of Duty games.
I once had an arguement like this with someone in CoD, they tried saying that grenade launchers used everywhere and against everything to the exclusion of all else was perfectly fine because (like you said) they exist in real life (although I believe that most casualties in modern combat are actually the result of crew-operated weaponary located a long distance away from the actual conflict rather than infantry, imagine if 9/10 times you got spawn killed by some bastard on an artillery piece X amount of miles from you behind a mountain, that would be realistic but very irritating).
Some try to defend breaks in the game like this by saying it's 'realism', but you don't have to look to hard that they've made more than a few acceptable breaks from reality to make the game playable (oddly enough, reality does tend to get in the way of fun).
Look at things like regenerating health, everyone having a secondary weapon, arbitrary bullet power, the lack of back-blast from rocket launchers, the lack of any form of command or order between players, the way knife fights play out and much more.
We can't really defend it by saying it's realism because it really isn't, the game has broken weapons and abilities and people usually have good reason to complain, that doesn't mean they can expect anything to come of their complaints though (and Bad Company 2 is just as bad in this regard by the way).