Maybe I am just biased but Fallout seems to be deeply rooted in the art deco fifties futuristic styling and based heavily in American cold war culture. Transplanting that into a European setting might not make any sense.
Eh? Off the top've my head the mystic bullshit seems extremely limited. Temple of trials seemed like something they'd found rather than built, the visions could well happen without Mr. Shaman's influence as a result of the main characters guilt and fears, the only magical bit I can think of would be the shaman being alive at a critical stage but that hardly seems excessive, albeit it'd been more cool to see the ruined place.Denamic said:Fuck no.
Arroyo and all that mystic bullshit was the worst thing ever to happen to the Fallout universe.
Tribals, sure, but not magic, visions, mystery temples, etc.
That shit has no place in Fallout and should be forgotten.
If anyplace, I would say London too.Sizzle Montyjing said:I have no idea why, but fallout London just works for me.
It's non-exsistent, but i can get a really vivid image of a crumbled big ben standing tall over a ruined London.
Plus in my mind the soundtracks is already pretty sorted, and locations are good.
In a sentence:
London want's to be nuked!
Correct me if I am wrong but wars(on the Middle East if I remember correctly) broke out over poor economy and lack of resources. It has been a while since I read up on any of the Fallout Lore.5t3v0 said:No its not. Chernobyl actually happened, thats not to say that The Events in Stalker actually had much to do with the initial incident as "It was an undisturbed location for our group of misguided scientists to do science." And I could go on for longer if I had the time and patience about both games being almost infinitely different from each other. And I also don't get why STALKER is always labled "Post apocalyptic". I thought Post apoc. was the world, not just a small(ish) corner of Ukraine?Soviet Heavy said:Fallout Europe exists. Its called Stalker.
The thing is, fallout Lore (which should be followed more accordingly, I'm looking at you bethesda,) has Europe pretty much decimated before the United States even was nuked. It could work, but it Might not. Also, Fallout's social commentary was always poking at the US paranoia of communism. Europe is pretty chilled out in the paranoia regard IMO.
I love your idea, good sir!Istvan said:How about setting it 50 years after Fallout 2 in Arroyo, see how things have progressed, meet new people, see old faces, continue storylines, y'know, 'sequel to Fallout 2' type things.
Actually, China and Europe got it even worse than America.GonzoGamer said:If anyplace, I would say London too.Sizzle Montyjing said:I have no idea why, but fallout London just works for me.
It's non-exsistent, but i can get a really vivid image of a crumbled big ben standing tall over a ruined London.
Plus in my mind the soundtracks is already pretty sorted, and locations are good.
In a sentence:
London want's to be nuked!
But (and I may be dead wrong about this) I always got the impression that the US and China were the only ones who got bombed to the stone age. I feel like the rest of the world is largely unaffected and is also perfectly happy to let US & China slowly dig themselves out and leave everyone else alone.
It wouldn't? Seemed to work when Akira Kurosawa took the formula for 'westerns' and used samurai instead of cowboys... and I'm pretty sure he didn't set them in the US.Volan said:Fallout follows the Western Mythology canon:
1) Lone, unknown hero wanders into new region/society
2) Hero initially distrusted by society
3) Hero proves to have some amazing ability
4) Villains threaten society
5) Hero defeats villains, saves society
6) Hero joins society as success (and occasionally loses "Hero" status - now fully belongs)
This code is followed through in many "Wild" Western and American narratives, and Fallout essentially follows this same code. Removing America from the equation makes this narrative suddenly redundant and would make no sense. If it were to take place somewhere else, the core plot would need to change - no longer could a "lone wanderer" fit.
No you are correct, I am just stating that STALKER is nothing like Fallout other than the fact that it has radiation in it too. Hell, Stalker Doesn't even have nuclear weapons even mentioned ingame.robert01 said:Correct me if I am wrong but wars(on the Middle East if I remember correctly) broke out over poor economy and lack of resources. It has been a while since I read up on any of the Fallout Lore.
Thanks for clearing that up. Where in the canon do you find out what happened in EU?Daddy Go Bot said:Actually, China and Europe got it even worse than America.GonzoGamer said:If anyplace, I would say London too.Sizzle Montyjing said:I have no idea why, but fallout London just works for me.
It's non-exsistent, but i can get a really vivid image of a crumbled big ben standing tall over a ruined London.
Plus in my mind the soundtracks is already pretty sorted, and locations are good.
In a sentence:
London want's to be nuked!
But (and I may be dead wrong about this) I always got the impression that the US and China were the only ones who got bombed to the stone age. I feel like the rest of the world is largely unaffected and is also perfectly happy to let US & China slowly dig themselves out and leave everyone else alone.