Poll: Should You keep your old consoles when the new generation comes?

Recommended Videos

Lightknight

Mugwamp Supreme
Nov 26, 2008
4,860
0
0
I'm not unhappy with my closet full of antique gaming systems. I mean, I don't play them anymore with the exception of an occasional SNES, N64 or PS2 title. But I've never felt like the retail stores gave me a good enough deal to make it worth my time. So I just kept them.
 

Blank Verse

New member
Nov 17, 2008
249
0
0
I voted no, although it is likely a different reason than the ones given here.

I quit console gaming a few years ago when my Xbox 360 failed to satisfy me. Instead, I built a gaming rig.

Just finished a new one. I'm much happier with it than I've been with any console.
 

elvor0

New member
Sep 8, 2008
2,320
0
0
Never! In fact I have a spare PS2 as well, purely because they're still available and they've stopped making them. The PS3 has no backwards compatability and I still play my old ps1/2 games from time to time, so there's no other way to play them. Well until I have a PC capable of emulating PS2 games at any rate, but you'd be surprised at how much of a resource hog that is.
 

PeterMerkin69

New member
Dec 2, 2012
200
0
0
I'll be keeping my PS3 because Dark Souls 2 isn't going to be on the PS4 for a long fucking time, if ever. That's almost a deal breaker for me on the console side because I'm guaranteed to enjoy DS2 more than any launch titles for as long as it takes until Dark Souls 3 comes out. Damn it.

I'll probably keep my haggard 360 around because I have a lot of games that I like for it and I may get the bug to go back and play Dead Space or RDR again at some point. Not to mention I won't be buying Microsoft's next console after the sorry fucking state the last one was in, so there'll be nothing with which to replace it anyways.

I gave my Gamecube to my father and, when he died, I didn't bother to get it from his girlfriend. I regret that, although the Wii is pretty much backwards compatible with its software, isn't it? I still haven't played Eternal Darkness or that fugly cell-shaded Zelda game.

His other girlfriend's kids kept his DS. I probably should have fought for that because the last time I had a Nintendo handheld console was during the Gameboy Color era. Damn it two times.
 

Yuuki

New member
Mar 19, 2013
995
0
0
Considering the sheer volume of "duh, of course" replies I think a more approapriate question would be whether a new console generation should have backwards compatibility or not, after all that is the overarching topic here...but it's already been done to death in another thread or two (I think) :p
 

chadachada123

New member
Jan 17, 2011
2,309
0
0
Yes, absolutely.

I still plug in and play my N64 and NES on occasion, and very much regret selling my SNES long ago. It's even more true for handheld games like Pokemon.

I am equally confused by people that sell current-gen games to Gamestop, getting maybe $5 for a game that Gamestop turns around and sells for $50. At the very least, you should sell used games online and get a decent price both for you AND them.
 

DuelLadyS

New member
Aug 25, 2010
211
0
0
I've got an Atari 2600 hooked up right now- old games are kinda my thing.

I'll likely get rid of the Wii if/when I get a Wii U, since it's backwards compatible and my mom said she'd like it for Wii bowling... the PS3 and Xbox 360 stay.