And next day, everyone INSIDE of your family dies. You think they would be so stupid to send a guy with an expensive briefcase without making sure he's safe? ;ppimppeter2 said:I would just kill the old guy and take the briefcase.
But the problem with that is that you're setting yourself up as a reasonable judge of the worth of a human life; maybe even worse, you're claiming that you have the right to make the decision for someone else whether they're going to sacrifice their own life for the greater good. Who are you to make that decision for someone else, complete stranger or otherwise? Plus, what if the person you kill is a pedophile who also happens to be on the verge of discovering a cure for cancer? So you killed one "evil" person to save hundreds, but that person could have saved millions.* Christ, I'd go insane trying to wrap my head around that, to say nothing of the fact that I don't think you can put a dollar value on a human life no matter what the circumstances are.Mrsnugglesworth said:I wouldn't say its flawed, because thats very true. If I could die so hundreds could live (not live better, mind you) I would do it.dududf said:Yeah.
High likely hood that the person was not living a good life, and I'd use at least half of the money to better other peoples lives, and or save them.
What's one life in comparison to a couple of hundred?
Now yes I know that logic is flawed, as it may ruin the lives of many more then 1, but nonetheless it'd still better many more.
OT: at least 20 times, considering its outside my family.
Hey, it sounded good ^_^ When in doubt, answer your own question.Gladion said:Fuck. I figured so much when I was halfway through my answer, after having read it properly again, but then I was so proud of my intelligent answer, I wanted to continue![]()
yea I'm new to the forum, I had to put my first post somewhere, right?Demented Teddy said:Interesting first post.Printscreen said:7 times.
No shit Sherlockrokkolpo said:people die all the time anyway.
why care about 1 more?
also i'm kinda sadistic.
You are right that we cannot judge the worth of relative lives, which is why I would not do it for 1 million, because (1 million not being as much money as it used to be) I could save maybe 20 lives, and who knows, that 1 guy might have saved more, BUT if it was around 10 million, I would do it, because I could be reasonably sure that I would have made a positive difference if I properly applied the moneydantheman931 said:But the problem with that is that you're setting yourself up as a reasonable judge of the worth of a human life; maybe even worse, you're claiming that you have the right to make the decision for someone else whether they're going to sacrifice their own life for the greater good. Who are you to make that decision for someone else, complete stranger or otherwise? Plus, what if the person you kill is a pedophile who also happens to be on the verge of discovering a cure for cancer? So you killed one "evil" person to save hundreds, but that person could have saved millions.* Christ, I'd go insane trying to wrap my head around that, to say nothing of the fact that I don't think you can put a dollar value on a human life no matter what the circumstances are.Mrsnugglesworth said:I wouldn't say its flawed, because thats very true. If I could die so hundreds could live (not live better, mind you) I would do it.dududf said:Yeah.
High likely hood that the person was not living a good life, and I'd use at least half of the money to better other peoples lives, and or save them.
What's one life in comparison to a couple of hundred?
Now yes I know that logic is flawed, as it may ruin the lives of many more then 1, but nonetheless it'd still better many more.
OT: at least 20 times, considering its outside my family.
Anyway, I dunno how the movie ends, but the Twilight Zone episode ends withSo again, since I know how the story ends, just fucking hell no.them pushing the button, then finding out that they're going to be the ones to die if the next person pushes the button. Better spend that million fast.
*Note: I'm not defending pedophilia, before anyone says it.
it wasn't a statement smartass.danpascooch said:No shit Sherlockrokkolpo said:people die all the time anyway.
why care about 1 more?
also i'm kinda sadistic.