The problem with the "kids can't understand moral reasoning" argument is the following: When are they able to understand it? Right. When they already have an idea of moral.LebbyLegs said:In my opinion the problem with your theory is that you seem to be acting as if your punishing an adult. Young Kids don't understand complex punishments or explanations, nor do they give a shit.Exterminas said:Statements like this one make me stick to my opinion.Thumper17 said:People like you are the entire reason the world is so messed up.Exterminas said:Both are absolutely retarded punishments and any parent who has even a remote understanding of basic education mechanics won't apply them.
A punishment that does not require a child to understand the reason it is punished for, isn't worth anything.
If they do something bad, you take something away. They will soon learn that by doing that bad thing, they lose something they like.
It is needlessly agressive and personal and shows clearly that the author didn't bother to read my following posts or the rest of the thread.
I think such behavior is the result of lower-level-moral-thinking. If you don't bother about things that go beyond personal consequences (If I do something bad, I might get punished) then you don't have any understanding about what is good or bad as soon as there is no clear punishment (see: Internet forums). Unfortunatly moral reasoning is nothing that is given to us from birth (contrary to what the early british empirists might say).
It is something that has to be learned. And a child can't learn that if the punishment for missbehavior does not reflect the missbehavior. Spanking and grounding are both incredibly arbitrary, they lack a connection to reality. How many spanks are worth a shoplift? How many are child abuse?
If you must punish you children, do it by emphazing the value of the broken rule. Someone earlier joked about me by asking, if I would punish my kid, that had beaten a neighbor, by allowing the neighbor so slap it.
Definately! I am not about wrapping kids in cotton, but about punishment that as a connection to the missbehavior and encourages moral reasoning. If my kid feels the pain of being beaten by another kid first hand, it will understand why we don't do that. You cannot recreate the same experience by withholding a xbox.
If your kid jumps on the table and starts dancing around swearing and the like, you cant really start explaining why that is not socially acceptable, and then divine an appropriate punishment that matches whatever way they acted like a silly bugger. Instead you pluck them off the table, give them a firm smack, say 'Don't do it again' and the kid will stop.
My parents smacked me when I misbehaved, and I turned out alright, as did most of my charming, smart friends.
Smacking your children doesn't make you a bad parent, in fact, if used sparingly it makes you a better paret, because your not afraid to be firm with your children, so they grow into good people who can divine right from wrong.
If you start then, it is too late.
You can't start early enough with moral education, because it won't do any damage if you are too early and will be fatal if missed.
You can always beat you kids into submitting to your will after you failed trying to explain it.
In your example of the dancing kid I see two reasons why the kid should not do it
a) it might hurt itself
b) it is annoying
So I would just let the kid keep doing it. If it falls down and hurts itself (a) I will probably learn. (Hot stove) If it doesn't I would get into the kid's room at night and dance on it's table. Hell that must be annoying. Of course you still have to talk to you kid and explain things and not just act like a lunatic at late hours.