Take a look at my post again. I acknowledge that it was only my OPINION that the Board had a hand in rejcting the photos. I at no point ever state that is is 100% fact that the board had a hand in it, only that it was my personally held belief that such was so. And please don't quote the OP, just quote the part that you have a problem with.Aethren said:My thoughts? I'd ask you to kindly get your facts straight before posting this. The schoolboard had NO say in this, it was the yearbook staff (other students!) who declined it. Flawed posts just skew the people's perception away from the truth, it's not very professional and leads to bias and falsehoods.
And it's hilarious how you fought hypocrisy with a negative generalisaiton.Phasmal said:Its hilarious how gamers will jump through hoops for catwoman having her shirt open, `She's sexually liberated! It's empowering! Don't judge her for the way she chooses to dress!`
But if a REAL girl should- Whore.
I gathered what I did about her intellect from how she presents herself and the way she speaks.Phasmal said:If you arent `Against` her having racy pictures, theres no need to throw the word `Whore` around, is there?Digitaldreamer7 said:Snip.
And if they dont agree with `selling` their students, there wouldnt be an `Ad` place in the first place. Besides, modelling is her interest. Her intellect isn't the thing that should be called into question, it's the fact that had they just printed the picture, it would be a big deal to exactly no-one.
I'm British, so I've never had a yearbook.Digitaldreamer7 said:Did you get a senior or HS year book or are you outside the US by chance?