EmileeElectro said:I don't know if any of you watch the show Supernanny (UK)
But today's episode (which has finished, catch it on 4oD if you're interested in watching it) Supernanny took part in an 'experiment' (I only caught the last few minutes, but got the gist of what they were doing) where she separated 20 boys. One half played a violent War game and the other half played a non-violent football game. After they played for a while, they were taken to a separate room individually to be interviewed. The interviewer purposely knocked some pens over to see how the children reacted. She wanted to see if the children who played the violent games were polite and kind enough to pick up the pens. None of them did, but a couple of the non-violent players did, so they concluded that playing violent war games influences children to be less polite.
I just don't understand.
Surely, parents have the most influence over the children? I was brought up to be polite as I'm sure many of you were, so I don't understand why they are purely blaming video games. Why not music? Or TV?
It actually angered me; I may be saying this as a gamer,but if they changed it to "shoe shopping makes children violent" or something I equally hate, I'd still be ranting about it.
So I ask you, do you agree with this? Or are they just out to scare the parents and stop kids playing video games? And if you pay violent games yourself, do you become influenced by them? Have you became a less polite person because of it?
I personally think it's down to parenting as the child as an individual.
This is the only article I can find on it
First childcare megastar Dr Tanya Byron came to the earth-shattering conclusion that "violent videogames are harmful to children, but it's the parents fault they've got them in the first place" and tomorrow night, Supernanny Jo Frost will also tackle the thorny subject of kids and videogames - and how to limit Little Johnny or Jenny's intake to acceptable levels
Meh, it wasn't half as bad as some of the people on here, and at least you apologized for it.Jaranja said:Exactly, I'm glad you agree and understand my typing. I zoned out a bit.factualsquirrel said:Yeah, this isn't even close to science. It's one of the reasons I don't watch TV anymore, that most of the stuff on there is bullshit. That woman quite obviously has never heard of science, as a control group of 10 with no pretests results in wildly inaccurate results.Jaranja said:That is a bullshit experiment. It's not even an experiment. If you're going to make a massive generalization like that; you need a hell of a lot more participants. The extraneous variables here affect the results in such a manner that I don't even think this experiment counts at all, even with more participants.Amnestic said:God if that's what passes for 'science' in these shows I'm glad I don't watch TV anymore.EmileeElectro said:I don't know if any of you watch the show Supernanny (UK)
But today's episode (which has finished, catch it on 4oD if you're interested in watching it) Supernanny took part in an 'experiment' (I only caught the last few minutes, but got the gist of what they were doing) where she separated 20 boys. One half played a violent War game and the other half played a non-violent football game. After they played for a while, they were taken to a separate room individually to be interviewed. The interviewer purposely knocked some pens over to see how the children reacted. She wanted to see if the children who played the violent games were polite and kind enough to pick up the pens. None of them did, but a couple of the non-violent players did, so they concluded that playing violent war games influences children to be less polite.
I just don't understand.
P.S. Sorry for awful typing.
If there is one thing that can make me go into a mass murdering frenzy its Casual/Puzzle games.JRCB said:How about they reverse the test now? I have the non-violent game players switch to the violent game, and vice-versa.
As well, did all of the non-violent game players pick up the pen?
I'd say to scare the parents, so they won't buy them a violent game like COD, but a happy lovely game such as Spyro.Bluebacon said:20 children is not a representative sample at all. Why does this rubbish get aired?
This is massively stupid. Sometimes I wish I could walk up to these people and fill their face full of all of our valid arguments that we escapists have been hoarding. It seems that these people (Almost all of which will NEVER have played these games themselves) jump to ridiculous conclusions about video games and their effects onto children. It's times like this when I realise that I am on the escapist and these people will never read this. Damn I wish I was somebody of importance.EmileeElectro said:they concluded that playing violent war games influences children to be less polite
LordMoose said:Oh oh oh, and
Ramirez!
Pick up those pens!