My definition is "Using violence and intimidation to advance a politcal agenda"...Souplex said:The definition of terrorism is "Using fear to advance a political agenda" so you could say that fox news is guilty of terrorism. When you say terrorism who are you talking aboot?
That is more I dunno violenceism or something?Random argument man said:My definition is "Using violence and intimidation to advance a politcal agenda"...Souplex said:The definition of terrorism is "Using fear to advance a political agenda" so you could say that fox news is guilty of terrorism. When you say terrorism who are you talking aboot?
The American revolution was terrorism and it was pretty damn effective.The_ModeRazor said:It's not very nice.
And not very effective, either.
Ok...Souplex said:The American revolution was terrorism and it was pretty damn effective.The_ModeRazor said:It's not very nice.
And not very effective, either.
That's not even a word...Souplex said:That is more I dunno violenceism or something?Random argument man said:My definition is "Using violence and intimidation to advance a politcal agenda"...Souplex said:The definition of terrorism is "Using fear to advance a political agenda" so you could say that fox news is guilty of terrorism. When you say terrorism who are you talking aboot?
the IRA,Al Qaeda,PLO ect. i can go on and on.Souplex said:The definition of terrorism is "Using fear to advance a political agenda" so you could say that fox news is guilty of terrorism. When you say terrorism who are you talking aboot?
Well the IRA did manage to scare the shit out of Britain. so now we have the republic of Ireland.The_ModeRazor said:It's not very nice.
And not very effective, either.
Then continued for the next few decades, but Northern Ireland remains part of the Union. It can have varying results.hippykiller said:Well the IRA did manage to scare the shit out of Britain. so now we have the republic of Ireland.The_ModeRazor said:It's not very nice.
And not very effective, either.