First off, I wanna make everyone aware of the movie
See No Evil, Hear No Evil [link]http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0098282/[/link]. Richard Pryor and Gene Wilder, great watch.
I choose blind but would want a deaf buddy as in the movie.
Ti0k0 said:
I would rather be deaf, because you can still read and participate in society when you are deaf. But don't think of it too lightly; Deaf means you will never be able to listen to music again, and never have that much fun at festivals and concert!
What the hell do you think Braille is numb-nuts? Blind people can read too. Also, Deaf people have a difficult speaking because they cant even hear themselves. Even if you went deaf midway through your life, youll wind up making spluttering noises or shouting because you cannot determine how you yourself are making noises. Deaf people tend to be mutes because trying to speak is too damn difficult. Thats why the term "deaf-mute" comes from. You cant even hold a conversation unless BOTH you and the other person know sign-language. How do you expect to participate in society when deaf people have a MUCH harder time communicating with everyone else than blind people?
I would rather be blind. Sure you lose sight, but blind people have been recorded to develop sonar...SONAR. Deaf people can see their environment sure, but that doesnt mean they're still aware of their surroundings. People can sneak up on you, you cant hear people shout warnings, etc. You still miss a large amount of everything that goes on.
Blind people can make up for that by increasing their hearing. Even separating noises from others and detecting even subtle sounds everyone else cant pick out.