Poll: The biggest d*** move of 2011

Recommended Videos

aba1

New member
Mar 18, 2010
3,242
0
0
Vuliev said:
Blizzard's asinine decision to make Diablo 3 online only. There were no words to express my frustration and astonishment.
huh I was actually gonig to get that since I had never bought diablo before guess that games cut from my list.
 

Thunderhorse31

New member
Apr 22, 2009
1,818
0
0
Where's the option for Nintendo doing, well, anything it did this year?

Release a gimmicky, over-priced handheld that barely anyone wanted,
Ignore your existing console (i.e. release no games) to focus on a newer, gimmicky-er console,
Give a big middle-finger to Project Rainfall,
Tow the line of re-releasing old games instead of making new ones,
etc.
etc.
 

Aprilgold

New member
Apr 1, 2011
1,994
0
0
Wheres all of them, because ALL were massive dick moves.

Active Schizophrenic said:
I said the real money in-game Auction house for Diablo 3, well i guess there is always torchlight 2. My other option would have been Capcom. Also how is breaking a companies monopoly on P.C. game distribution wrong? so they don't want valve taking a cut out of the sales of there games whats the problem?
Because EA shouldn't have been the ones to do it, EA already has a backwards-ass marketing and customer support, because of this, they have a backwards-ass system, competition is never bad unless by the wrong people, you wouldn't have a pacifist fight a saber tooth lion that has been on cocaine and trained to kill.
 

Aprilgold

New member
Apr 1, 2011
1,994
0
0
SgtFoley said:
I am cheering for blizzard. It kind of feels strange to say that.

necromanzer52 said:
I must've missed the EA origin service controversy. What's the problem?
Steam keeps pulling EAs games of steam. Something along the lines of they dont want EA selling the DLC in game and not through them. Its actually more of steam acting like a little child then anything that EA has done.
Excuse me, but didn't EA just SUDDENLY launch this with very little talk about it, and the fact that they took off the games [yes, THEY did, not Valve] that people already payed for through Steam don't get to keep those games?

Again, EA is EVIL, almost blizzard evil, but valve is a middle ground.
 

baddude1337

Taffer
Jun 9, 2010
1,855
0
0
None of the above. A personal gripe more than anything, but the excessive amounts of DLC for DiRT 3 is really bugging me. I paid full price for the game, why do I have to spend more every week if I don't want the game to remind me every 5 minutes I don't have the latest DLC? The DLC already currently available probably amounts to more than I paid for the game.
 

Odbarc

Elite Member
Jun 30, 2010
1,154
0
41
Blizzard's AH is the only thing that affects me and I'm not against it. I may never use it for myself (other than to sell my gold or something for money).
 
Sep 14, 2009
9,071
0
0
ubisoft first, that's bullshit, then activision, although i don't mind, i hope kotick digs himself into a hole he will never be able to get out of, and then EA's origin service is a massive annoyance for everyone..
 

fix-the-spade

New member
Feb 25, 2008
8,637
0
0
42 said:
I won't add Valve's removal of EA games, as it is quite obvious that EA did it on purpose to get their game exclusively on Origin.
I disagree entirely.

The sticking point seems to be that EA insist on players being able to update their games from EA content and third party servers (think Gamespy, Fileplanet, IGN etc).

Valve insist you buy new content Via the Steam client and the Steam client only, whether or not it's a Valve game.

Basically, they are throwing their toys out of the pram because they can't go taking extra cuts of each game sale.

This is Valve's first major Dick Move and it's by far the biggest of the year. They only banned updates coming from outside the steam client very recently (as in, the last couple of months). Most EA games update from EA's own servers, not Steam, as a result Valve have been retro-actively removing EA games that violate their new rule from Steam.

Fair enough, unless you bought one of those games on Steam. You can still play it, but can no longer update (because you can only update games in the Steam folders using the Steam client now) and should your game need re-installing due to corruption or and error, then you're out of luck.

Valve's attitude towards customers in this position is best summed up as 'bugger off,' They won't be giving refunds to users who bought the games and are now left with potentially bricked content.

Basically, Valve is attempting to throw it's weight around as biggest publisher on the PC. They dropped this rule change (effectively a massive price hike for everyone that isn't Valve) without any warning and simply used the threat of removing games to force publishers into line. Indies and small publishers can't afford to be off Steam.
EA however can, EA also have (amongst other things, which I'm sure you can think of) a history of standing up for themselves and evidently took umbridge at Valve suddenly moving the goal posts for publishers of games on Steam.

For all their many, many faults, EA are innocent in this one. The blame lies firmly with Valve and it's a worrying trend. This is the first time I can think of where Valve have abused their position as market leaders, I hope it's the last or the image of Valve as the customer focused ray of light in PC gaming's DRM black hole could disappearing in the next few years.

#Edit, it should also be noted that none of the releases from EA in the next twelve months will be Origin exclusive, they'll be available on all download serviecs and as physical copies, but not on Steam.
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,429
0
0
fix-the-spade said:
Valve insist you update your game (and buy new content) Via the Steam client and the Steam client only, whether or not it's a Valve game.
Sorry Spade, not true. I've done it in the past few months.
 

No_Remainders

New member
Sep 11, 2009
1,871
0
0
Biggest dick move? I'd definitely go for the whole, bomb + shooting in Norway. That was probably the biggest one.
 

ThatDaveDude1

New member
Feb 7, 2011
310
0
0
Ubisoft's DRM is the only thing on this list I would actually classify as a "dick move," so by default I had to choose it.
 

Pandabearparade

New member
Mar 23, 2011
962
0
0
Treeinthewoods said:
My vote goes to Valve for making EA take their games off of Steam.

What? Why is everyone looking at me like that?
Rabble rabble rabble! Your blasphemies will NOT be tolerated here, sir!
 

Grey_Focks

New member
Jan 12, 2010
1,969
0
0
Capcom. killing Megaman and releasing MvC3 three times in one year. And the new DMC looks bad. And not bring Monster Hunter across seas. And just generally continuing to fuck up all things Resident Evil.

Really Capcom can just die now.
 

neonsword13-ops

~ Struck by a Smooth Criminal ~
Mar 28, 2011
2,771
0
0
Neverhoodian said:
On a personal level, it would have to be the announcement of Brothers in Arms: Furious 4.
Fuck you, Randy Pitchford. Fuck you, Gearbox. Fuck you, Ubisoft. Way to shit all over the hopes of fans of the series. You've managed to replace what was respect with unadulterated loathing in just over three minutes. That's damn impressive, in a dickhead sort of way. I hope you're happy, dickheads.

I usually don't resort to such language, but I feel it addresses my dissatisfaction in the most adequate and direct way possible (plus I'm still mad about it).

In general though, it would probably be the "always online" DRM. If I bought a single player game for the PC, the last thing I want is to be punished if my roommate accidentally kicks out the modem chord.
Pitchford says the company will be getting back to the World War II era with the original story and characters. I Read it in the E3 coverage for this game in Game Informer.
 

theriddlen

New member
Apr 6, 2010
896
0
0
Neverhoodian said:
On a personal level, it would have to be the announcement of Brothers in Arms: Furious 4.
Fuck you, Randy Pitchford. Fuck you, Gearbox. Fuck you, Ubisoft. Way to shit all over the hopes of fans of the series. You've managed to replace what was respect with unadulterated loathing in just over three minutes. That's damn impressive, in a dickhead sort of way. I hope you're happy, dickheads.

I usually don't resort to such language, but I feel it addresses my dissatisfaction in the most adequate and direct way possible (plus I'm still mad about it).

In general though, it would probably be the "always online" DRM. If I bought a single player game for the PC, the last thing I want is to be punished if my roommate accidentally kicks out the modem chord.
They are just using the old brand to boost the interest in title. It was said that normal BiA is also in development.
 

DustyDrB

Made of ticky tacky
Jan 19, 2010
8,361
3
43
Grey_Focks said:
Capcom. killing Megaman and releasing MvC3 three times in one year. And the new DMC looks bad. And not bring Monster Hunter across seas. And just generally continuing to fuck up all things Resident Evil.

Really Capcom can just die now.
Three times? What's the third?
 

psicat

New member
Feb 13, 2011
447
0
0
Valve's dipshit move of pulling games off Steam if they aren't allowed to sell the DLC directly.