Learn about double standards. We're talking about 'chick' not 'cock' I wouldn't mind being called a 'chick'. Just because I'm a guy it changes to the masculine?Zannah said:Would you be comfortable with females calling you a cock? If so, go ahead.
Learn about double standards. We're talking about 'chick' not 'cock' I wouldn't mind being called a 'chick'. Just because I'm a guy it changes to the masculine?Zannah said:Would you be comfortable with females calling you a cock? If so, go ahead.
I just went to say the exact same thing, but it looks like you beat me to it. I hardly see what's offensive about referring to a person in a casual, friendly manner.TheTaco007 said:I use it, but I don't think it's offensive at all. It's like calling a bloke a "dude" only it's a girl so it's a "chick."
I don't think there's anything wrong with that.
It's not offensive. anyone who is "offended" by being called a chick, is just a feminist out of control looking for a reason to argue and spout her feminist rant. A word is nothing more than a vocal medium to convey meaning, therefore it is the meaning which is important, not the word used to convey that meaning. Considering that most people use "chick" to mean a woman, therefore, it is no more offensive than the word woman. If it is used to convey a condecension, or an insult, then that meaning is offensive, but this is not a condemnation of the word in general. many "politically correct" words can be used mockingly or as an outright insult, that doesn't mean that the word is itself insulting.AvsJoe said:I know it's offensive but I always use the word "chick". It makes a great verbal shorthand and doesn't come with the potential downsides that other single-syllable words have, like girl or babe.
You've probably never heard of a woman being refered to as a 'slurry' before, either.Father Time said:The use of gash to refer to a person is alien to me.
A mixture of insoluble liquids? I don't get it.RhombusHatesYou said:You've probably never heard of a woman being refered to as a 'slurry' before, either.
It started as slang for a woman who has unprotected sex with different partners over a short period... meaning she was full of a slurry of cum.Dags90 said:A mixture of insoluble liquids? I don't get it.RhombusHatesYou said:You've probably never heard of a woman being refered to as a 'slurry' before, either.
But they do look like penguins! I know, I spent time living with some nuns!Dags90 said:A mixture of insoluble liquids? I don't get it.RhombusHatesYou said:You've probably never heard of a woman being refered to as a 'slurry' before, either.
I usually use "dude" or "women". It's pretty inappropriate to refer to say, a group of nuns as "a bunch of chicks dressed as penguins" though.
Almost.Nurb said:Man/woman
Girl/boy
Guy/chick
It's just the slang term for women just as "guy" is the slang term for men. Neither are derrogatory and anyone that has a problem with it is too uptight and hug on political correctness. Besides, if chick is wrong to use, then they can't say "guy" either, and they all do.
Yea but who says "Gal" anymore? Guy/chick is pretty much the slag term settled on, regardless of it's originslacktheknack said:Almost.Nurb said:Man/woman
Girl/boy
Guy/chick
It's just the slang term for women just as "guy" is the slang term for men. Neither are derrogatory and anyone that has a problem with it is too uptight and hug on political correctness. Besides, if chick is wrong to use, then they can't say "guy" either, and they all do.
Guy/Gal
Stud/Chick
That's much closer in my mind. Comparing animals to animals.