Maybe yes. Ends should not justify the means. I do not care how valid their arguments are, they lose the debate by forcing their views onto others.
I suppose learning a martial art, especially a highly technical one like chi-blocking, would take years of training, and most benders would prefer to devote their time to learning the style of their own bending. I imagine that the majority of non-benders who have learnt to fight would be on Amon's side, especially after the oppressive crap that Tarrlok and the council pulled. Perhaps the reason they don't use the lightning gloves is because they might be a bit restrictive? Benders seem to use their hands a lot to manipulate the elements. Also, Asami's dad probably wouldn't make them available to the enemy. They would only have the ones they seized, if any.Mortai Gravesend said:That is true about the policemen. Properly trained Equalists are a match for the metal bending policemen so it's quite unfair not to let sufficiently trained non-benders be policemen as well.manic_depressive13 said:Doesn't it strike anyone as incredibly unfair that you need to be a certain kind of bender to work at a particular job? You need to be a metal bender if you want to be a policeman, and you need to be a lightning bender to work at the power plant. The latter makes sense at least, but why are all the police metal benders? Surely a chi-blocker could subdue a criminal just as well.
I also wonder why they don't try and use the Equalists weapons against them. That lightning glove seems pretty damn useful. Or learn their own chi blocking.
Why? Tarrlok could certainly have scared them enough to give up freedom for security.Mortai Gravesend said:To those saying the council might not be benders currently, I'd think that they all agreed to put the curfew on non-benders highly suggests they are. They could possibly have willingly stuck a curfew on themselves and their families, but that just seems incredibly unlikely.
If a man with a baseball bat demanded my lunch money, I'd give it up. In fact, I'd be more scared of the guy with the bat. Either can kill me, but a firebender is rarer and more likely to leave evidence.senordesol said:As illustrated beautifully in the first episode, when a bender asks for your lunch money; you give it up.
That's roughly analogous to someone committing sexual harrassment and getting castrated for the first offense.Anoni Mus said:In my opinion they should pass a law that if any bender commits a crime using his bending his bending will be taken.
Simple and fair.
I'm not really sure about the police, though if they are all earthbenders, at least metalbending is a pretty good reason for it. A chiblocker could subdue a criminal just as well...up close. Metalbenders, on the other hand, can subdue at range, and they still have normal earthbending for capture and transport. It's like having an entire police force of Spiderman clones, without the angst.manic_depressive13 said:Doesn't it strike anyone as incredibly unfair that you need to be a certain kind of bender to work at a particular job? You need to be a metal bender if you want to be a policeman, and you need to be a lightning bender to work at the power plant. The latter makes sense at least, but why are all the police metal benders? Surely a chi-blocker could subdue a criminal just as well.
If his bending removal power and bloodbending resistance is any indication, at the very least he seems to be an akashabender like the Avatar.Syzygy23 said:Wiat, since when can Amon bend? I haven't seen him bend ANYTHING in any episode so far.
Your right, I had forgotten about the Dai Li and the fishing village. I feel Tarlok's actions don't count here as he was abusing he's political powers, not his bending. I concede that benders can and do abuse their powers. But I think the big issue is do we punish the majority for the actions of the minority?senordesol said:snip
Shouldn't the police force be comprised of those most capable of enforcing the law and protecting people? In the real world, we want our police to be able to deal with certain situations, which require them to be strong, smart and be proficient in firearms. The police in the world of the Avatar have to deal with more difficult situations, like chasing the Avatar through the streets on a Polar Bear Dog. It seems obvious to me, that like any job, those most capable of fulfilling the job requirements would be the one who is hired.RC's police force is comprised primarily of metal benders, the Dai Li were all Earth Benders.
I feel one thing we might need to consider is how much bending is natural ability, and how much is due to training and practice. On her own, Katara only managed simple water bending techniques and even then required a lot of effort on her part. Most competent benders are seen to be adults or were dedicated to bending from a young age (Aang, Toph, Bolin, Mako). It seems that while there is some natural talent, the bulk of there power and abilities comes from practice and training. So if the bender has had to do years of training to get the advantage, why should the non-benders get to complain if they do not put in the same effort to better themselves?A bender automatically has the advantage UNLESS someone has access to years of combat training or a piece of complicated technology
I don't think there is a difference. I'm pretty sure shooting fire from your hands comes under the definition of gifted =PFurther, there's a difference between a 'gifted' individual and one who can set you alight just by thinking about it, or one who can puppeteer you to commit acts against your will, or one who can rend the very ground you walk on. Surely that would give any of us pause.
You're forgetting things like metal-bending which could tear most of the more modern technology in TLOK apart, and lightning bending, a now fairly common place skill, that can kill a non-bender easy since they don't have the chi-pathways to use redirection.senordesol said:Furthermore, aside from the 'simple' vanilla control over Earth, Fire, Water, and Air; some benders can 'kick it up a notch' in a variety of ways. For example: a Water Bender's power increases during a full moon and -for some- so much so that they can 'blood bend' (turn another person into an unwilling slave by bending the water in their body) some blood benders are so powerful that they can control groups of people even during the day. A centennial comet increases a fire bender's power several hundred fold (nearly allowing a fire lord to burn an entire nation to the ground in a matter of hours [with help]).
Even in the TLA there were plenty of non-benders who fought back, a good portion of the cast could not bend and could fight off a bender, Ty Lee, Sokka and Mai come to mind immediately. The average person probably could not though, you're right about that.Until now, a non-bender had little recourse to resist any abuses of power by benders apart from 'give them no reason to notice you'.
A lack of bending is not bending.Knight Templar said:The only way to permanently remove bending is spirit bendingSyzygy23 said:Wiat, since when can Amon bend? I haven't seen him bend ANYTHING in any episode so far.
Yay blood bending is illegal. But when a blood bender is as powerfull as tarlock? Who can stop him? Weve seen only TWO EXAMPLES IN THE ENTIRE WORLD of people who can resist blood bending. The avatar in the avatar state. Which is obvious. And amon. Because that guys a freak of nature. A truely powerfull blood bender has TWO people in the world to fear and everyone else to enslave. Weve seen its possible to drive the avatar underground or kill them. Amon is likely only a mortal. Only two lives need to be taken to ensure almost a full lifetime of control over the population (until a new avatar comes along and is trained). Its illegal sure. In the same way its illegal for Dr Manhattan to steal a coke. But are you going to stop him? He could rip you apart in a second.pffh said:One (well now two) Blood benders EVER have had the ability to blood bend when it's not a full moon and besides blood bending is illegal.
No, that is pretty much exactly the same. The entire idea is abhorrent.Anoni Mus said:No it isn't.NeutralDrow said:That's roughly analogous to someone committing sexual harrassment and getting castrated for the first offense.Anoni Mus said:In my opinion they should pass a law that if any bender commits a crime using his bending his bending will be taken.
Simple and fair.
Can you think by yourself why it isn't the same? I hate explaining obvious things.
Unless you come up with something better than a cop out "I can't be bothered to explain", I can only assume it is you who is ignorant.Anoni Mus said:Another stupid example.Flames66 said:No, that is pretty much exactly the same. The entire idea is abhorrent.Anoni Mus said:No it isn't.NeutralDrow said:That's roughly analogous to someone committing sexual harrassment and getting castrated for the first offense.Anoni Mus said:In my opinion they should pass a law that if any bender commits a crime using his bending his bending will be taken.
Simple and fair.
Can you think by yourself why it isn't the same? I hate explaining obvious things.
EDIT: Here is a slightly better example. The fastest runner in the world (No police could catch him on equal terms) decides to take up crime. After many chases he is finally caught and it is ruled that his legs be broken so he can never run again. That is effectively what we are talking about here.
Think before you speak.
Don't bother waiting for an explanation from me. I don't have time to waste with trolls (or ignorant)
You can disagree, but thinking what you both said it's the same is idiotic.
1. You make a good point with the minority/majority dilemma, however I can't help but stress that those enforcement agencies were exclusively comprised of benders (Correction: It's conceivable that the radio crew we saw last episode were NBs, but I'm talking about field officers). Consequently, it could be argued 'Not every bender will oppress you, but any one who will oppress you will be a bender (A gross over-generalization, I know, but it would no doubt carry significant weight with any NBs in earshot when they consider all the gross excesses that have happened over time).Lizardon said:1.Your right, I had forgotten about the Dai Li and the fishing village. I feel Tarlok's actions don't count here as he was abusing he's political powers, not his bending. I concede that benders can and do abuse their powers. But I think the big issue is do we punish the majority for the actions of the minority?
2.Shouldn't the police force be comprised of those most capable of enforcing the law and protecting people? In the real world, we want our police to be able to deal with certain situations, which require them to be strong, smart and be proficient in firearms. The police in the world of the Avatar have to deal with more difficult situations, like chasing the Avatar through the streets on a Polar Bear Dog. It seems obvious to me, that like any job, those most capable of fulfilling the job requirements would be the one who is hired.
3.I feel one thing we might need to consider is how much bending is natural ability, and how much is due to training and practice. On her own, Katara only managed simple water bending techniques and even then required a lot of effort on her part. Most competent benders are seen to be adults or were dedicated to bending from a young age (Aang, Toph, Bolin, Mako). It seems that while there is some natural talent, the bulk of there power and abilities comes from practice and training. So if the bender has had to do years of training to get the advantage, why should the non-benders get to complain if they do not put in the same effort to better themselves?
Also complicated technology? A lot of the time the Equalists manage to subdue benders using only a bolas, a piece of cord with weights at both ends.
4.I don't think there is a difference. I'm pretty sure shooting fire from your hands comes under the definition of gifted =P
The problem I really have with this is that we are dealing with hypothetical's. This person could use there natural abilities to control people, this person could kill someone easily etc. Should we really take action and implement things like legislation based on what could potentially happen at some point? Or should we give people the benefit of the doubt, trust that they will do the right thing, and only take action when they've proven themselves to be irresponsible and dangerous.
I know you tried to calm some peoples fears of these "bender" individuals, but your post had the opposite effect on me:Theron Julius said:Additionally, they're ordinary people in every other respect. They have no greater tendency to be "evil" than non-benders.
The ability to "enslave" people (bloodbending) is illegal and incredibly rare. There are very few even capable of the feat, let alone know how to do it and are willing to use it. Doing it under any circumstance warrants swift and harsh punishment under the law.
The comet that give firebenders immense power only comes around every 100 years and only lasts a few hours. To destroy a nation with it takes immense numbers and years of planning and it has only been done once against a nation that had no formal military of any sort.
As you haven't made a case and the time you have spent of these forums is irrelevant, I am going to conclude you are being contrary for the sake of it.Anoni Mus said:I don't care. I've been on forums for so much time, that I've reached a stage I don't care anymore. And unless you find something new or interesting to say I rest my case on this topic.Flames66 said:Unless you come up with something better than a cop out "I can't be bothered to explain", I can only assume it is you who is ignorant.Anoni Mus said:Another stupid example.Flames66 said:No, that is pretty much exactly the same. The entire idea is abhorrent.Anoni Mus said:No it isn't.NeutralDrow said:That's roughly analogous to someone committing sexual harrassment and getting castrated for the first offense.Anoni Mus said:In my opinion they should pass a law that if any bender commits a crime using his bending his bending will be taken.
Simple and fair.
Can you think by yourself why it isn't the same? I hate explaining obvious things.
EDIT: Here is a slightly better example. The fastest runner in the world (No police could catch him on equal terms) decides to take up crime. After many chases he is finally caught and it is ruled that his legs be broken so he can never run again. That is effectively what we are talking about here.
Think before you speak.
Don't bother waiting for an explanation from me. I don't have time to waste with trolls (or ignorant)
You can disagree, but thinking what you both said it's the same is idiotic.
First rule of this show(both of them): don't use that word. I can't tell you why but I've heard it drives some members of the fandom insane. Like brony-level insane. Just warning you.Uncreation said:... because i don't like anime
Now see, I wouldn't call them superpowers. Technically they are, but both series have shown bending to be somewhat different from superpowers. A few examples are:Uncreation said:...that is led by a minority of people born with superpowers
That's actually not a quote from the first episode. But it is a nice sum up of a situation demonstrated in that episode.Uncreation said:...Like another poster said before (i think he even said it was a quote from the first episode of the show): "if a bender asks you for your lunch money, you give it to him".
This happened in the first show. 2 of the group of heroes who helped save the world happened to be non-benders. These 2 people were well respected among their friends and fought just as well as them.Uncreation said:If a group of "evil benders" showed up to enslave everyone, and a group of "good benders" defeated them, the fate of the world, including the fates of all the regular people, was still shaped by the group of "good benders", not by any of the average people.
Others have disagreed with me, but I personally think he's kind of sketchy. He hides behind a mask and seems to have some kind of personal prejudice against benders.Uncreation said:The only thing that would stop me from doing that is having some sort of doubt about the guy. For example: what is he doing this for... could he simply be doing this in order to grab power himself?
The first show has shown that the little contact that the four nations had with eachother made it harder for peace between them. In fact, the United Republic of Nations, the setting of the second show, was meant to bring everyone together.Uncreation said:I guess however, forming a separate nation composed only of non-benders would also be acceptable in order to avoid bloodshed.