Countless times I've seen theories about life/psychology/tuna/etc attacked, their validity questioned merely due to fact they imply something we might not want to hear/know.
The fact something is not nice to know does not affect it's validity or importance in the slightest, and I was horrified to find that even exam boards would use this justification as an acceptable method to poke holes in theories (Sigmund Freud papers, I'm looking at you).
The whole 'blissful ignorance' argument is used by many people without them even realising what they're saying. You know exactly what you're saying, so do not let ignorance enter your life.
(I think that makes sense, I'm quite tired)
The fact something is not nice to know does not affect it's validity or importance in the slightest, and I was horrified to find that even exam boards would use this justification as an acceptable method to poke holes in theories (Sigmund Freud papers, I'm looking at you).
The whole 'blissful ignorance' argument is used by many people without them even realising what they're saying. You know exactly what you're saying, so do not let ignorance enter your life.
(I think that makes sense, I'm quite tired)
"Fuckin' magnets, how do they work?"