Does anyone follow a "moral" guideline for playing video games, as in differentiating between "good/moral" (informing teammates of enemies or traps, healing another player, etc.) and "bad/immoral" (spamming, camping, tea-bagging, etc.) behavior, and choosing to do moral/not to do immoral things? If you do have video game ethics, why do you follow it? So that everyone can enjoy the gaming experience? Because it's wrong to act like an asshole? Because that's not how the game was meant to be played?
Or do you just play to win? I know some people like that. They give reasons like they don't believe in a difference between "good" or "bad" behavior (but still differentiating between "asshole" and "friendly"), the end justifies the means, it's "dog-eat-dog", survival of fittest, etc.
Personally, I used to have some ethics, such as never using Juggernaut (ever; I wouldn't even use the standard LMG class because it had it), not attacking if the enemy is afk, not tea-bagging (unless it's a joke thing with friends) etc. But now, I've seem to lost that morality; if someone uses Juggernaut, I use Juggernaut (but I really prefer Stopping Power). I tea-bag everyone I defeat on SC4. I trash talk if someone annoys me.
Or do you just play to win? I know some people like that. They give reasons like they don't believe in a difference between "good" or "bad" behavior (but still differentiating between "asshole" and "friendly"), the end justifies the means, it's "dog-eat-dog", survival of fittest, etc.
Personally, I used to have some ethics, such as never using Juggernaut (ever; I wouldn't even use the standard LMG class because it had it), not attacking if the enemy is afk, not tea-bagging (unless it's a joke thing with friends) etc. But now, I've seem to lost that morality; if someone uses Juggernaut, I use Juggernaut (but I really prefer Stopping Power). I tea-bag everyone I defeat on SC4. I trash talk if someone annoys me.
