- Jan 19, 2009
So what do you suggest we should have done?Milky_Fresh said:No, it wasn't the right thing to do. Nuking a city full of civilians could never be the right thing to do. The torturing of POWs was horrible, but not relevant. Any of the atrocities commited by the Japanese in that war were irrelevant. It wasn't the civilians who were doing that. Besides that, it isn't like the allies never put a foot wrong in the war. If you are suggesting that doing it for revenge was right then you are a fuckwit. If that isn't what you believe, then what? We should have just exterminated them?Wounded Melody said:How would this make anyone look cool?Milky_Fresh said:Wow, you guys love having the alternative view huh? The majority of people on this site honestly believe that nuking Japan was a good thing? Get over yourselves. Obviously this isn't directed at everybody, or even everybody that voted "no". Just most of you. To argue for something like this to make yourself look cool is fucking reprehensible.
It wasn't a "good" thing but it was the right thing to do. We actually should have done so sooner if possible as the Japanese were such MONSTERS to civilians and POWs. It makes me sick every tme I think of what they did.
Sacrificed our soldiers lives by going in there to fight? Maybe we should have just left the Japanese alone completely?
No one said we were doing it for revenge. We were stopping horrendous atrocities. The Japanese were torturing and killing CIVILIANS not just soldiers.