Poll: What Do You Think Is Currently The Worst Thing In Gaming?

Recommended Videos

Brogan Cordova

New member
Jul 29, 2012
15
0
0
Didn't see an option for it, so I went with microtransactions since it's closest.

Biggest problem is cost, which encompasses the cost to make a game (too high), the price it's sold at (too high, especially with inevitable price drop), and how the cost is much higher than the amount of people actually willing to buy the games.
 

Snotnarok

New member
Nov 17, 2008
6,308
0
0
No one having any middle ground on their opinions, games seem to either be great or shit. Seriously opinions are so black and white it's somewhat unnerving. I don't see many people saying "the game was pretty fun" it's just AMAZING or FUCKING SHIT or in the case of the Escapist threads every week "MASS EFFECT 3 HAD A BAD ENDING! D:"

Devs/pubs not trying other genres pumping AAA budgets into only shooters

Companies trying to push DRM in thinly disguised masks trying to suggest it's good for social interaction no one asked for.

It's all a mess.
 

Souplex

Souplex Killsplosion Awesomegasm
Jul 29, 2008
10,308
0
0
The worst thing in gaming right now is that we're in that awkward between generations phase when releases slow to an absolute crawl.
I don't get all the hate lumped on DRM. It's just the industry trying to get the few remaining PC gamers to jump ship to a medium with less piracy where such measures aren't necessary.
 

SSJBlastoise

New member
Dec 20, 2012
500
0
0
Incoming wall O' text.
Adon Cabre said:
This last generation of consoles has killed off over 120 Developer Studios.
Hate to point this out but this is business; companies fail and others begin. You can try and be all doom and gloom and say 120 died off but you shouldn't neglect the 80 or so new ones (that's if wikipedia can be trusted). Yes, it is bad that there are 40 less (not accurate) but it would be better to look at what kind of companies were they. Were they small companies that made niche games? Or studios that released buggy games.

Triple AAA games have budgets bigger than Movies
Now, if you're taking the numbers in the article as fact then you might want to realise that a certain percentage of the game price goes to the retailer which could be up to 30% (it's hard to find numbers on this because valve and other companies don't really like talking about it). I'm also willing to bet that a lot of money is spent towards marketing and seeing as gaming is a relatively new area for mainstream audiences then advertising is needed to get more sales but there is a chance (hopefully) marketing budgets come down as games are more known throughout the mainstream media.

Not to mention the platforms PS4, PC & Xbox720.
So which console gets the most sales?
Who wins the big chunk of the $?
No one. Yeah, that's smart.
I'm not sure if you're really trying to suggest we give up on everything and just make one platform because to be honest, that is kind of stupid. People like their freedom in being able to choose how they play their games. As to which console gets the most sales, it completely depends on the game. COD and sports games (just a guess but I don't really know of anyone that plays FIFA on a PC) sell excellently on consoles while games like The Witcher and Counter Strike sell well on the PC.

All 3 next gen consoles will flop as they now have to compete with AFFORDABLE premium smartphones, ultrabooks, laptops, tablets and mid-range pc's
I find this bit to be pretty hilarious really. I mean, smartphones being a reason why console gaming dies? You give someone the option of playing a game like GTA on either a phone or a console what do you think they will choose? Now, onto PCs. There have been many threads here about why console gaming will die and such because PCs a better. I will admit, PCs are better because you have more freedom which is great; if you know what you are doing. The point is not everyone is capable of building their own computer (therefore cost to buy a computer increases)and becomes more than the cost of a console for the same graphics qualities (and the possibility it might not even run new games). This is where consoles have the advantage, there is no worrying about "will my console run this game?" because it will (assuming disc isn't scratched).

Why is mom going to buy her son or daughter a next gen console, when she just bought them a Laptop and Galaxy S4? Or what if she gives them a choice? What's more important: a console, a cellphone or laptop.
I'm going to have a guess if a mum can afford a laptop and an S4 I doubt they can't afford a console. The choice thing is really circumstantial and depends on the person and situation. For a child at home they would most likely have a family PC which would eliminate the need for a laptop. Depending on what you use a phone for a simple, cheaper one may be a better option if you only text or call people (or are prone to losing them like one of my mates is -_-). Even then, most people wouldn't need to choose one because if they can afford one then surely, over time, they could afford the one they see as the next important choice.

Another point Emily makes is that there is no way the next gen titles will sell on those platforms when they are being ported to current gen consoles for the sake of publishers breaking even or even making a profit.

My most anticipated game is Watchdogs, and which is coming out for the PC and PS3, which I both have. The same is happening for Assassin's Creed 4: Black Flag. So what's the point of a PS4/xbox720?
Well besides from the most likely fact that the next gen versions will look much better there is also a chance that the next gen versions may have extras in them due to the improved hardware of the new consoles. From what has been show so far of Watchdogs it looks like it is a very complex and ambitious game and I've wondered since the announcement of it if the current gen of consoles will be able to run it as well as it is hoped to be.

The Wii U failed to sell not because of software; but because there is absolutely no need for it in the market place. There is no need for another console to share 3rd party ports with the PC, Xbox360, and PS3 -- and this was what Nintendo was really banking on, 3rd Party Support.

Not only did this console lack any distinctive quality from its last iteration, and not only did it lack a plethora of major exclusive titles
The console has been out for for 6 months and it's already a failure? I'm not quite sure how that is possible when most new consoles take off slowly. the following graph helps put things in perspective.

Another cause of this can be because of what I bolded in your statement. People are waiting for the big games to come out and see what Nintendo will do. Their big sellers (Zelda, Mario Kart, Super Smash Bros and Mario Party) aren't even out yet and these games always sell in massive numbers.[/quote]

The Wii failed miserably after that 3 year golden period
When you have sold nearly 100 million consoles (if wikipedia is to be trusted) that would kind of be understandable because so many people have your console already, why would they need to buy a new one?

Anyway, phew, finally got that all out. Sorry about the wall O' text everyone.
 

rob_simple

Elite Member
Aug 8, 2010
1,863
0
41
Nothing is causing me to lose faith in the gaming industry. I watched a trailer for that Monaco game the other day and it looks like a whole sack of fun. I can't wait to get a computer that isn't so shitty it can't run Steam and reap the massive crop of indie games I've missed out on.

Wait, what's that? Oh...you're assuming that the mainstream is the be all and end all of gaming today. Again. Well, I lost interest in AAA titles a while ago, (I've actually had Gears of War 3 since it came out but never played it,) but my faith in gaming is consistently renewed on an almost weekly basis when I see a new project from a developer I love, (I'm looking at you, Suda 51, you mad bastard.)
 

NecroNinja

New member
Sep 20, 2012
47
0
0
rob_simple said:
my faith in gaming is consistently renewed on an almost weekly basis when I see a new project from a developer I love, (I'm looking at you, Suda 51, you mad bastard.)
Very nice callout on Suda there, I genuinely get excited whenever they announce a new project. But reminds me of another problem. Shadows of the Damned was a great game and one of the most enjoyable games I've played in a long while. But its sales were terrible. So it is worrying that so much consumer spending is funnelled into AAA games instead of games with more effort and originality as eventually, it is fair to assume that said original games will simply not be able to get made, or publishers will not bother with them. As much as I love indie games, they still need an audience, and I despair at how greats like Shadows of the Damned slip under people's radars whilst everyone seems to have a release date for the latest Call of Duty before a single line of code has even been written for it. At the moment we as gamers are relying on the developers to continue making these great games for enjoyment, despite making a loss on many of them. It can only go on for so long before they call it a day.

I particularly like someone's comment from earlier about dialogue between gamers and publishers/developers. I do agree that the industry needs to attend to feedback from their audience, and in turn the audience should give constructive and achievable feedback. It'd be interesting to see if that made a difference, particularly with bigger companies like EA and Activision.

I recently read an article in a British magazine (FRONT - if you were wondering) about indie gaming and it mentioned an upcoming wave of what I can only call Mini-Consoles dedicated to indie games that anyone can develop and share. Whereas this is a cool idea in theory, can these games really offer much and do that well in an industry where far higher budgets and more advanced tech is more widely used?
 

Shoggoth2588

New member
Aug 31, 2009
10,247
0
0
It seems like a lot of DLC today is what you would get for free in the past. I know, I know, I've seen how DLC works and is made but that doesn't excuse some of the stuff we do see. The worst thing about achievements and trophies are the fact that it basically killed cheat codes. There are a number of games that allow you to use codes I know but they were a lot more prevalent in the before time, in the long-long ago. The idea of paying for content that you can unlock by playing the game seems weird to me but I understand it. The idea of paying actual, real-world money for a cheat code that you can download is stupid.

Also Multiplayer again. The game with the best multiplayer ever is the game that allows you to access every multiplayer mode offline and with bots in addition to offline and with friends in addition to online and with friends who are right there with you and, online, and with physical friends and, with people you meet online and, with bots. That game doesn't exist (unless it does, I think there's a Quake on the 360 that people have told me I should play but there should be more than one game in this day and age). The best example I can think of when it comes to how multiplayer should be is Time Splitters: Future Imperfect. A ton of playable characters who you unlock by playing the game (including monkeys, robots, etc), bots are enabled, you can play with friends AND bots and you can play the game online. This was done under the EA umbrella too...what the Hell happened between then and now?! I think the second best multiplayer game based on my criteria would be...Mario Kart Wii! I'm unsure if couch-co-op players can take their party of 2-to-4 online or not...
 

Hazy

New member
Jun 29, 2008
7,422
0
0
Developers/journalists who act as if treating gamers with a modicum of decency is taboo.

"Oh, you don't want Day 1 DLC in your game that you payed full price for? Stop being so entitled!"

And then you have people like Phil Fish who think their games are so goddamn sublime that we should be bowing our heads in praise that he graced us with a $9 price tag for a year old game like FEZ, instead of charging us $90 - and then proceeding to call his fanbase "fucking ingrates."



Give me a fucking break.
 

rob_simple

Elite Member
Aug 8, 2010
1,863
0
41
NecroNinja said:
rob_simple said:
my faith in gaming is consistently renewed on an almost weekly basis when I see a new project from a developer I love, (I'm looking at you, Suda 51, you mad bastard.)
Very nice callout on Suda there, I genuinely get excited whenever they announce a new project. But reminds me of another problem. Shadows of the Damned was a great game and one of the most enjoyable games I've played in a long while. But its sales were terrible. So it is worrying that so much consumer spending is funnelled into AAA games instead of games with more effort and originality as eventually, it is fair to assume that said original games will simply not be able to get made, or publishers will not bother with them. As much as I love indie games, they still need an audience, and I despair at how greats like Shadows of the Damned slip under people's radars whilst everyone seems to have a release date for the latest Call of Duty before a single line of code has even been written for it. At the moment we as gamers are relying on the developers to continue making these great games for enjoyment, despite making a loss on many of them. It can only go on for so long before they call it a day.

I particularly like someone's comment from earlier about dialogue between gamers and publishers/developers. I do agree that the industry needs to attend to feedback from their audience, and in turn the audience should give constructive and achievable feedback. It'd be interesting to see if that made a difference, particularly with bigger companies like EA and Activision.

I recently read an article in a British magazine (FRONT - if you were wondering) about indie gaming and it mentioned an upcoming wave of what I can only call Mini-Consoles dedicated to indie games that anyone can develop and share. Whereas this is a cool idea in theory, can these games really offer much and do that well in an industry where far higher budgets and more advanced tech is more widely used?
I agree with your concern about great games that don't have mass appeal slipping under the radar, but I don't think it means they'll stop getting made. Many of the games I've enjoyed most this generation have been either PSN or XBLA games, precisely because they buck current trends and harp back to a time when games were primarily concerned with being fun. Because of the massively reduced budgets on these smaller games, they can afford to take a lot more risks creatively, and that same small budget makes them easier to fund, especially now that we have things like Kickstarter which allow the developers of classic games to make the sequels both they and the fans want, without being beholden to the publisher whims that inevitably turn every reboot into a futuristic and/or military-based shooter. Things like Kickstarter also provide a brilliant potential for the dialogue between consumer and developer that you mentioned.

Also, on the subject of dialogue, I think the internet has forced developers/publishers into being more open about how they operate, and this can be both good and bad. Despite the recent shit he's been catching, I like the fact that Randy Pitchford frequently takes to Twitter to explain the technical reasons behind things like level caps in Borderlands 2; it helps to dispel the common belief held by many gamers that developers do things they don't like just to piss them off.

I'm a bit iffy on your last point about what a low-power indie console can offer us when big budgets and top-tier tech is order of the day, because I don't think that's the case for a lot of people. Yes, there are the people who will throw their money at every Call of Duty game without second thought, and maybe they even make up the majority nowadays, but I'm confident there will always be a market for smaller developers; it only seems less popular because it doesn't have the benefit of hundreds of thousands of dollars being thrown into marketing.

Maybe I'm just being overly optimistic, but given the fears surrounding both Sony and Microsoft's new consoles, I can see the age of hardware-based cock-measuring and wanking off over polygon counts coming to a predictably messy end, and in the wake of that collapse there will be a chance for the smaller developers to stand up and start getting the recognition they sorely deserve.
 

rob_simple

Elite Member
Aug 8, 2010
1,863
0
41
Hazy said:
Developers/journalists who act as if treating gamers with a modicum of decency is taboo.

"Oh, you don't want Day 1 DLC in your game that you payed full price for? Stop being so entitled!"

And then you have people like Phil Fish who think their games are so goddamn sublime that we should be bowing our heads in praise that he graced us with a $9 price tag for a year old game like FEZ, instead of charging us $90 - and then proceeding to call his fanbase "fucking ingrates."



Give me a fucking break.
I am almost certain that that is supposed to be a joke. No businessman would so openly commit career suicide.
 

AlbertoDeSanta

New member
Sep 19, 2012
298
0
0
The Community. Especially with all the rampant Sexism discussion on this particular forum. The sooner this wave of Sexism allegations is gone, the better.
 

Dandark

New member
Sep 2, 2011
1,703
0
0
For me it's a combination of DRM and Micro transactions. League of legends is one of my favorite games and I have spent a lot of money on it, I don't mind the idea of micro transactions but sometimes they just get silly.

You have games that you have to pay for getting Micro transactions put in them and games will have pieces cut out to sell as DLC later.

That and DRM.
 

MeChaNiZ3D

New member
Aug 30, 2011
3,102
0
0
I didn't vote because those are just all too good as options. Although a fair few would be solved by people being more upstanding in regards to what they will and won't accept from publishers, the problem being that plenty of them ("the masses", if I may) don't actually mind about DRM, DLC, microtransactions, pricing etc. Personally I'm going to cement my title of prick by saying casualisation/the perception of what is a 'safe' game to make/the franchisation of most good games, which sort of ties in to gamers, but is probably more money as the root cause.

I must say though, I am sick of people saying gamers complaining is the worst thing about gaming. Ironic though that statement is. Would you really prefer people just be content with what they get? And annoying as sexism/DkS easy mode/EA/whatever else threads may get, does at least something like DRM not bother you more?
 

Hazy

New member
Jun 29, 2008
7,422
0
0
rob_simple said:
I am almost certain that that is supposed to be a joke. No businessman would so openly commit career suicide.
Then you don't know Fishsticks, my man.

Browse his twitter, trust me, it's rich. You'll be fascinated at how easily a grown man can devolve into a temper tantrum.
 

rob_simple

Elite Member
Aug 8, 2010
1,863
0
41
Desert Punk said:
rob_simple said:
Hazy said:
Developers/journalists who act as if treating gamers with a modicum of decency is taboo.

"Oh, you don't want Day 1 DLC in your game that you payed full price for? Stop being so entitled!"

And then you have people like Phil Fish who think their games are so goddamn sublime that we should be bowing our heads in praise that he graced us with a $9 price tag for a year old game like FEZ, instead of charging us $90 - and then proceeding to call his fanbase "fucking ingrates."



Give me a fucking break.
I am almost certain that that is supposed to be a joke. No businessman would so openly commit career suicide.


Adam Orth would like a word with you.

OT: I am coming around for the gaming community idea, I mean Anita is part of the gaming community...
I must admit that made me laugh a lot, but I still feel like the kind of man who would choose a Twitter avatar that makes him look like a 70's rapist would consider calling his fans 'fucking ingrates' a joke.
 

rob_simple

Elite Member
Aug 8, 2010
1,863
0
41
Hazy said:
rob_simple said:
I am almost certain that that is supposed to be a joke. No businessman would so openly commit career suicide.
Then you don't know Fishsticks, my man.

Browse his twitter, trust me, it's rich. You'll be fascinated at how easily a grown man can devolve into a temper tantrum.
I took your advice, but I still don't know that I'm entirely convinced. Some of his Tweets seem like he's adopting a persona for comedic effect, and in others he just seems like a genuinely embittered lunatic.
 

Gameguy20100

New member
Sep 6, 2012
374
0
0
Gamer's no question never have I seen a fan-base more insecure more whiny and they are the only one's who I have ever had tell me I should Kill myself over a game I like. (I'm Looking at you Valve fanboys!!!!!)
 

FLSH_BNG

New member
May 27, 2008
179
0
0
Seeing as there is no "All of the above," option... Kinda no point in me voting. Asking somebody to pick the worst of several things he dislikes equally is rather asinine.

Though I never use gamefaqs...
 

rob_simple

Elite Member
Aug 8, 2010
1,863
0
41
Desert Punk said:
rob_simple said:
I must admit that made me laugh a lot, but I still feel like the kind of man who would choose a Twitter avatar that makes him look like a 70's rapist would consider calling his fans 'fucking ingrates' a joke.
I still duno, he is rather well know for making idiotic and rather incindiary comments, like telling a japanese developer that all his countries games suck..

http://venturebeat.com/2012/03/10/fez-creator-gamers-are-the-worst-fing-people/

And that gamers are terrible people..
Ohhh, I see it now, he's a preposterously self-important dickhead. I guess this is one of the problems faced by the indie market: when you don't have people above you, holding the purse-strings and checking everything you say, it's a lot easier to let your ego run completely rampant.
 

ResonanceSD

Elite Member
Legacy
Dec 14, 2009
4,536
5
43
Needs to be an "all of the above" option, tbh. I had to think for a long time if i hated poor QA or DRM more.