Fuck these Americans, how dare they generalise a race of people and tar everyone with the brush from actions taken by other people in the same general header! Fuck them all!Finch58 said:Stupid cocky arrogant Americans.That is all they are, yet they wonder why the rest of the world hates them.
Baneat said:Fuck these Americans, how dare they generalise a race of people and tar everyone with the brush from actions taken by other people in the same general header! Fuck them all!Finch58 said:Stupid cocky arrogant Americans.That is all they are, yet they wonder why the rest of the world hates them.
At least you're not broadcasting over the internet that you think they deserve it and that you're not just apathetic, but happy to see these things happening to people.Kroxile said:I can honestly say I don't give two shits about Japan. Yeah, some of you may think its cruel, but we have far too many problems of our own to be worrying about someone else's troubles.
To be honest, what war can you describe as not childish? In most wars, you can group any country as a child-like personality.Mackheath said:My hometown got annihilated by the Blitz in WW2. The Luftwaffe and the Third Reich shed no tears over that. So yeah, we have plenty of assholes; the world is full of them. I just find the talk of rules of war and chivalry childish and pathetic.Yarkaz said:Oh come now, Mackheath. I'm sure your country has plenty of jerks too, they just haven't hadd a giant demotivational poster made about them yet.Mackheath said:Americans are typically like bullies; any injury they take as a personal insult. They dish out the pain arrogantly enough yet bawl and whine when they have to take it.
But meh. All countries are the same. The second the bombs fall on home soil its white-flag waving and talk of the rules of war.
I don't wish for bad things upon anyone and most certainly not like Japan got. Don't get me wrong, I just think America has far too many internal problems for its citizens to worry about another country's issues.Sporky111 said:At least you're not broadcasting over the internet that you think they deserve it and that you're not just apathetic, but happy to see these things happening to people.Kroxile said:I can honestly say I don't give two shits about Japan. Yeah, some of you may think its cruel, but we have far too many problems of our own to be worrying about someone else's troubles.
I was more referring to whomever made that picture. It's a really idiotic picture.Wade-DeadPool said:Once again. I'm talking about the people that think this, NOT the country.BarbaricGoose said:Right.
17 people in America are assholes. I think it's fair to say that all of America is like that. I mean, obviously, what are there, 18 people in America? DURRRRR.
It was not an act of genocide in any literal sense of the word. In order for it to qualify, it would have to be part of an effort to destroy the Japanese race for some cause or another. The actual rational behind dropping the bombs was to force an end to the war. The only similarity is the scale of death and destruction, but, as it turns out, when modern industrial nations turn the full force of their industrial might to the task of destroying another nations basic capacity to wage war (not simply defeating them on the battlefield as was, for the vast majority of the history of armed conflict, the aim of warfare), casualties are enormous. All told, those produced as a result of the deployment of nuclear weapons are but a tiny fraction (by some estimates, a mere 0.2%) of the total casualties of the war. There were single battles that had death tolls an order of magnitude larger (Stalingrad, for example) and single bombing runs using conventional arms that produced similar casualties (the Firebombing of Tokyo is estimated to have killed 300,000 people and the bombing of Dresden <150,000).Revrant said:Uhh, that's an extremely callous, malicious way to take it, that we lose nothing and they lose hundreds of thousands of innocent women and children(No, not "some", that's weasel wording), it created animosity towards the US that to this day survives, it continues to be a contentious political issue, and it was one of the most terrible acts of genocide committed.
How does using nuclear arms differ from using conventional arms to achieve this same goal? Because, from where I'm standing, there is no difference at all.Christian Fernandez said:Furthermore, we were going to keep nuking civilians, as in, until they were either all dead or surrendered, we intended to keep preparing bombs and dropping them, it would have totaled a significant portion of the country's civilian population.
One cannot wage war and pretend to be righteous, and a belief to the contrary is largely what allows war to exist in the first place. It turns out, declaring that "your position is so very wrong that I will kill people who look and talk like you until you come around to my way of thinking" is always wrong. Thank god hypocrisy saves us from such conundrums.Christian Fernandez said:How, might I ask, would that be different from the genocide the Nazis were committed to? The reason I so detest it is because we nearly walked a very dark path, the path of our enemies, it is easy to wipe out millions of innocent lives to win a war, it is right to win with your soul intact.