I think it should die. New Vegas already wasn't needed. Fallout 3 shouldve been the end cause at this rate fallout won't be remembered as being kick ass in a high quality package
Now we know!RAKtheUndead said:Well, at least you admit your lack of knowledge. Canonically, Britain and the rest of Europe were annihilated in the Fallout universe; real life concerns of the European nations having far denser target grids than the United States come into play as well. In reality, Britain would be one of the hardest-hit nations, if not the hardest-hit, pound-for-pound, in a full-scale nuclear war, and Fallout's "Science!" wouldn't do much to prevent that.Baron von Blitztank said:While a Fallout: London doesn't sound bad, I don't think that the UK (or anywhere else in Europe) was hit that bad by the Nukes. If anything it'd be in the same condition as Las Vegas. But then again I haven't really looked up much about the Fallout universe other than the stuff that happens in the games so I'm probably wrong.
Bullshit to this.Theseus32 said:You guys are all missing the point. You don't understand. You weren't there at the beginning. Fallout is about one place. It has only ever been about one place. It is the STORY of that ONE PLACE. And that place is California and the areas around it. Every time they start to stray from California, the games suck. (The exception being Fallout 3, which gets a pass)
Fallout 2 is to this day still the greatest game ever made, if for no other reason then these three words. Lesbian Shotgun Wedding. At that point, fallout 2 won video game design for all time. Both 1 and 2 had something special going for them. A wicked sense of humor combined with very self-aware satire.
For the first time in 13 years, fallout is back in the hands of its creators. Feargus Urquhart, and Chris Avellone. Tim Cain is unfortunately doing his own thing, but Black Isle studios was, hands down, the best development team ever. And most of them are at obsidian. Now Bethesda I will give credit to for resurrecting fallout. And they were then smart enough to hand it off to its parents. Bethesda/Obsidian have a LOT of potential. More so even than squeenix. To those of you suggesting that Fallout should die with dignity... you first.
There have been 4 fallout games that matter. 1, 2, 3 and vegas. The rest never happened. Now the only piece missing is Tim Cain's warped sense of humor. But there are a lot of people with warped senses of humor.
So, tl;dr
Keep fallout in California where it freaking belongs. If you MUST switch location, do like vegas did and keep it close, and LET US GO BACK THERE. Klamath has gotten huge since fallout 1. I wanna see the new metropolis.
Radgators!!!Zack Jackson said:i say louisiana so you could battle mutated rednecks and mutant alligators, snakes , bears,and deer.and you could have like a bow or bowie knife. THAT WOULD BE AWESOME!!!
What? No! I loved the Mojave (more so than DC anyway) but that would suck! From the discussion of this thread, the results I gleaned were specifically:Skullkid4187 said:Goodness.....this is just silly. I'll leave it to the fallout wiki. The next Fallout will take place in the Mojave Wasteland anyway.
http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Fallout_series
New York would be interesting.Mrhappyface 2 said:I want Fallout somewhere new and interesting in the US like Honolulu or New York.