they're also very strange.PatSilverFox said:*shrugs*zehydra said:Furry is weird as hell, but it's just animals screwing instead of humans.
Vore is just a completely non-sexual thing being taken in a sexual way.
What about sado-masochists? That isn't sexual but it can be.
No it isn't. Furries aren't magic, it's certainly doesn't command unquestioning respect or devotion even by some of it's members, and not all furries use it in a erotic fashion.reg42 said:yeah it is.YukoValis said:Furry isn't really a fetish.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/fetish
I was talking about the sexual point specifically. I agree that if we aren't talking about sexuality then it's not.YukoValis said:No it isn't. Furries aren't magic, it's certainly doesn't command unquestioning respect or devotion even by some of it's members, and not all furries use it in a erotic fashion.reg42 said:yeah it is.YukoValis said:Furry isn't really a fetish.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/fetish
This guy wins the thread.Sejs Cube said:Waving the flag of moral relativism is adorable and all, but no, the last sentence wasn't a joke.
Vore makes a fetish of an act that, by its nature, involves the death of one party or the other. Eating and digestion is not a survivable process. Vore is in essence a snuff fetish with some additional bits stapled on. I am entirely comfortable calling that horrible.