Poll: Which RTS sequel do you want the most?

Recommended Videos

Best of the 3

10001110101
Oct 9, 2010
7,083
0
41
A toss up for me between Warcraft 4 and Rome Total War 2. Either of them would be amazing. Probably leaning towards Warcraft 4 more, mainly because I like fantasy and I've not liked the feel of Creative Asselmbly's recent RTS's but that's just personal opinion.
 

Sean951

New member
Mar 30, 2011
650
0
0
back pain said:
Rome: Total war 2
This one. With the incredible advances made in game play during Shogun 2, I would love to see it applied to Rome. The range indicator for archers and the Margin of Error for artillery are the things I most look forward to. Hopefully, they expand it to include more of Asia since it would be a lot of fun to lead Rome to war against China.
 

Vardermir

New member
Jan 18, 2009
24
0
0
Homeworld 3 all the way. No other RTS has managed to get true 3d space combat right. There have been games that have come close, but they all pale in comparison to the true master. Its a shame relic is too tied up making more Dawn of War games. Not that I'm complaining, those are good as well.
 

Shilkanni

New member
Mar 28, 2010
146
0
0
Rise of Nations 2 gets my vote! I wasn't really impressed with Rise of Legends, but still love RoN.
 

Final First

New member
Feb 13, 2012
131
0
0
I'd be tempted to say Warcraft 4, but then I remembered Rome: Total war. Warcraft 4 would be nice but it would be absolutely fucked lore-wise and I enjoyed the gameplay of Rome more. So my pick is Total War: Rome 2.
 

kasperbbs

New member
Dec 27, 2009
1,855
0
0
I really want a proper C&C game since i started my RTS career on one of their titles. Too bad that the recent titles just werent the same, and getting rid of traditional base building? They must have gone mad.. Hopefully Bioware can resurrect C&C.
 

JWRosser

New member
Jul 4, 2006
1,365
0
0
JaceArveduin said:
The Battle for Middle-Earth III

And I want it supported properly this time damn it! Such a fun game that never got any balance fixes due to them bastards at EA
Hey I thought I was the only one!

I loved BFME1 and 2....although both (especially the latter) were rather flawed. So yeah, BFME3, but get it right first time, EA. There is a hell of a lot to work with.


I'd also love a Mass Effect RTS but....
 

JamesStone

If it ain't broken, get to work
Jun 9, 2010
887
0
0
A sequel to Conmmand and Conquer 3: Tiberium War. I would very much like to know what happend after the...

Shut up, there is no sequel called Tiberian Twilight. That's just a legend to scare of the fans. Right?
 

SuperNova221

New member
May 29, 2010
393
0
0
I can't see what they could add to the Homeworld story, Cataclysm/2 were arguably unneccessary to begin with, a third one? Hm. But they were still both enjoyable, and managed to get space based RTS mechanics right, so maybe Homeworld 3 if they took it into a more competetive direction? I could get behind that.
 

LookingGlass

New member
Jul 6, 2011
1,218
0
0
I'm surprised by the lack of love for World in Conflict. It was basically an RTS game for action game fans... I thought it would be more successful. It wasn't as strategic as your typical RTS (I suppose it's more of a real-time-tactical game), but damn it was fun.

It's a pity that Massive Entertainment got eaten by Ubisoft and put to work on their popular franchises (Assassin's Creed, Far Cry). Although I just read "On August 6, 2008, Activision Blizzard put up Massive Entertainment for sale after the merger of Activision and Vivendi Games and the subsequent internal reorganization", so I guess Activision Blizzard are just as much to blame, for not realising they were sitting on a good thing.

Also, despite the team long being shut down, someone could've mentioned the wondrous creation that was Sacrifice.
 

Krantos

New member
Jun 30, 2009
1,839
0
0
Sid Meier's Civil War collection needs an update.


Give us something like Total war but with SMCW's Depth and focus on tactics. I'd buy that in a second.
 

Gaiseric

New member
Sep 21, 2008
1,625
0
0
I'd like to see a sequel to EndWar. And in some resource management, maybe throw in some Move/Kinect support in place of a mouse, and longer and I'm sold.
 

dyre

New member
Mar 30, 2011
2,178
0
0
I voted Warcraft 4, but really I'd like to see more Starcraft; the story interests me more.

Total War comes in a close third, but I've already got plenty of stuff in that series I haven't tried yet, including lots of interesting mods.
 

Fleetfiend

New member
Jun 1, 2011
479
0
0
LORD OF THE RINGS: BATTLE FOR MIDDLE EARTH 3.

Mother of God that would be wonderful to see.

But I voted for Supreme Commander 3, because I recently bought Supreme Commander 2 from Amazon for five bucks and I have been enjoying it extensively, even though my weenie of a computer lags extremely badly during endgame, and I drag everyone down. :(

viranimus said:
Just to throw this all out of Whack, Halo Wars.

I actually really liked it and disappointed it didn't merit a sequel.
This, also. I think Halo Wars was actually a really good game, especially considering that it was on the console. They did a really good job considering the limitations they had to work with.
 

Sanat

New member
Apr 7, 2012
149
0
0
World in conflict 2 would be the best thing to ever happen in history, ever. Like... awesome.

I don't see much that could be improved, and unfortunately the going trend for new RTSs these days was to change them for the worse by simplifying them hardcore. Maybe for once there could be an increase in complication, in the true spirit of Real Time STRATEGY.
 

Fiad

New member
Apr 3, 2010
572
0
0
Warcraft 4 without a doubt. I hate what WoW has done to the Warcraft name. And because of WoW, we are likely never to see WC4.