So the other thread has resulted in a landslide victory for loli porn being worse than furry porn. I think this was pretty expected. However, this makes me curious as to the Escapist's opinion on a different comparison: guro and loli/shota.
Lolicon/shotacon: Drawn fictional anime style porn depicting little girls and little boys.
Guro: Drawn fictional anime style porn depicting sexualized gore including, but not limited to, impalement, laceration, and dismemberment.
(Edit: People keep Googling this. Seriously, it's what it says on the tin. You don't want to see it.)
Which do you find to be more disgusting or morally reprehensible?
Bonus question: Because the people demand it! If a guro and a loli were drowning in an ugly whirlpool, which one would win in a fight? And how big of a mary-sue would that make them?
Lolicon/shotacon: Drawn fictional anime style porn depicting little girls and little boys.
Guro: Drawn fictional anime style porn depicting sexualized gore including, but not limited to, impalement, laceration, and dismemberment.
(Edit: People keep Googling this. Seriously, it's what it says on the tin. You don't want to see it.)
Which do you find to be more disgusting or morally reprehensible?
Bonus question: Because the people demand it! If a guro and a loli were drowning in an ugly whirlpool, which one would win in a fight? And how big of a mary-sue would that make them?