I've always found this Nazi hate to be really stupid. NPCs of that type were still new at the time. I mean, come on, your helpers in early
StarFox and
Resident Evil games were rather annoying, as well. Navi made fighting enemies so much easier, and she actually pointed me in the right direction from time to time. (Honestly, I was searching Zora's Domain/River for the Water Temple, and she told me to check Lake Hylia, where it actually was!) Besides, doesn't this little ball with wings (from what the low-level graphical capabilities can show us) look kinda cute?
However, shortly after I had started up
Majora's Mask, even before I had reached Clook town (I mean "Clock Town"), I already liked Tatl better, which I'm quite certain was because of the vastly-superior writing.
Then, there's Midna. She was perhaps the most well-developed character Nintendo had
ever created. Then... the ending happened. I hated it when
Bleach did that to Nel, and I hate seeing the same thing happen to Minda. It was a complete 180 on everything about her character. Everything.
Also, didn't Link have a companion or two in
The Wind Waker? I don't know much about that one, but didn't he have Medley and a talking boat? And as Sealpower pointed out,
Phantom Hourglass had a companion, too, didn't it?
Andy Shandy said:
Oh, no... It's gonna be another one of
those NPCs... (Does she even have arms!?)
CrimsonBlaze said:
Navi is also the reason for the existence of loud and occasional annoying Zelda companions. That and that alone make her the most annoying character; without her, the others would surely not come into existence.
No. Being first does not grant any sort of significance in that regard. By that logic, the original
Legend of Zelda should be the best
Zelda game ever or something, and no one really thinks that, do they? Did being the first
Bond girl make her the best, simply because she was first? How about the first RYNO in the
Ratchet & Clank series? Is Tikal automatically the worst information-giving companion in the
Sonic series? Are the Gen 1 starter Pokémon automatically the best or worst? Do any of these things make them them best or worst simply for being first? No. That's just terrible logic.