Yea? I?m frankly surprised that this managed to get to page 3. Vegeta vs Harry Potter isn?t Superman vs Lex Luthor, it?s an Imperial Star Destroyer vs. a 1/100th scale model of the Wright Brother?s plane. The power level of the two universes are entirely way too far apart.McMarbles said:We're talking a series where the characters were, at their base level, capable of vaporizing the moon, right?
That of course could also just be Dumbledore's interpretation as bad things happened to all of the brothers in the story. We'll have to agree to disagree on whether having all three makes Harry effectively invincible, especially seeing as I have pointed out myself that he is unlikely to possess all three in any confrontation. Besides by your logic aren't you basically saying that if push comes to shove Harry could have an army of zombies Vegeta would have to get through first guaranteeing the first strike? Sure Harry going full "Necromancer" does seem unlikely but then again in this argument we're also undercutting Vegeta's overconfidence by not giving Harry the first strike for those reasons. Like a lot of the discussion involved here one cannot hold Harry back for personality based limitations but then not do the same for Vegeta.Asita said:You're misremembering. The Philosopher's Stone is a legendary alchemic item, purportedly able to turn metals into gold and produce the "Elixir of Life", which classically has healing/rejuvenative properties. The Resurrection Stone is loosely based on the concept of necromancy in the way it allows one to summon the spirits of the dead, which again is the only ability ever truly attributed to it, though Grindelwald did apparently speculate it could allow him to raise a zombie army. The Philosopher's Stone was - to the best of the reader's knowledge only ever in the possession of Nicholas Flammel and the people guarding it, whereas the Resurrection Stone was the centerpiece of a ring owned by Voldemort's Grandfather (though he was unaware of its nature) and subsequently turned into a horcrux, and it wasn't until Dumbledore got his hands on it that anyone realized what it was...at which point his excitement led him to promptly forget that it was a horcrux and try to use it, resulting in the curse on his arm in Half-Blood Prince. There is nothing textually to suggest that the items are in any way related, and they are never purported to possess the abilities you're attributing to them here.Therumancer said:It has been a while, but my understanding from the books was that they were indeed one and the same item, the apparent destruction of the sorcerer's stone was a dupe so it wouldn't be expected to reappear. It's true nature not revealed (as opposed to what was said originally) until the concept of The Deathly Hallows was introduced. It has been a while however since I either watched the movies or read the books (which there are differences between) so I could be wrong but that is the understanding I came away with. Likewise my impression is that the Deathly Hallows were indeed created by death, however most people did not believe they existed because the idea was so far fetched, only a select few wizards and crackpots believing that such things were out there.
It's also perhaps worth noting that while various characters treat the concept of "Master of Death" said to follow the acquisition of the three Deathly Hallows as effective immortality, Rowling did clarify that it meant quite the opposite. To quote "As Dumbledore explains, the real master of Death accepts that he must die, and that there are much worse things in the world of the living. It is not about striving for immortality, but about accepting mortality." The stone possessing the ability to truly defy death would very much stand in opposition to that lesson.
Nevermind what I said about the speed difference between the two(Harry has about as much chance of hitting Vegeta as a 400lb man in a wheel chair hitting Quicksilver with a punch), transfiguring Vegeta wouldn't end anything - he'd just insta-gib Harry as a toilet paper dispenser or gerbil, as you said.Therumancer said:I mean don't get me wrong I've failed to turn the poll (big time) but at the end of the day the bottom line is that it ends with one strike, and if Harry decides to transfigure Vegeta it's over. He's probably got dozens of ways of getting a shot at him, all of which can be argued, but at the end of the day Vegeta would likely just give him that shot and then spend the rest of his Saiyan existence as an endless toilet paper dispenser or a gerbil or whatever.![]()
However, it should be noted that Vegeta gets hit by energy blasts all the time, he dodges some yes, but he also gets nailed. Harry doesn't have to punch him. What's more with transfiguration there doesn't appear to be any blast or beam to dodge. What's more the way it works in the Wizarding world is that transfiguring a living thing into an object or animal doesn't allow the person transfigured that way to retain any of their powers or abilities. Vegeta would for example just be a normal Gerbil, fish out of water, or piece of furniture, he wouldn't say be a Gerbil with Super Saiyan powers anymore, although it could be argued the methods used in his universe might cause that to happen, but he's not dealing with a shapechange enforced by someone in the DBZ universe. The bottom line is all Harry needs is one shot and it's over, the same for Vegeta.kyp275 said:Nevermind what I said about the speed difference between the two(Harry has about as much chance of hitting Vegeta as a 400lb man in a wheel chair hitting Quicksilver with a punch), transfiguring Vegeta wouldn't end anything - he'd just insta-gib Harry as a toilet paper dispenser or gerbil, as you said.Therumancer said:I mean don't get me wrong I've failed to turn the poll (big time) but at the end of the day the bottom line is that it ends with one strike, and if Harry decides to transfigure Vegeta it's over. He's probably got dozens of ways of getting a shot at him, all of which can be argued, but at the end of the day Vegeta would likely just give him that shot and then spend the rest of his Saiyan existence as an endless toilet paper dispenser or a gerbil or whatever.![]()
Vegeta is an alien martial arts master from the action-comedy universe of "Dragon Ball Z" where a lot of the characters have very silly names. A good comparison for him would probably be if one of the well known cosmic-level DC or Marvel characters took kung-fu lessons. He tends to run around the universe sort of like "Champion" from The Marvel Universe using a device called a "scouter" to evaluate the power level of different beings and challenge those that he thinks are strong to duels. The whole "over 9000" joke from DBZ is a reference to scouter-power ratings where they frequently run into beings who are so powerful that they max out the limit on how far the scouter can evaluate them. At top Tier a lot of the DBZ characters can destroy planets as easily as someone like Superman or The Silver Surfer could, it's just that unlike those characters they use this power casually (especially for comedic effect) and like a lot of Anime characters self control is not the strong suit of pretty much anyone in that universe. While Vegeta doesn't destroy planets casually, guys from that universe have done so, so sort of envision what would happen if Superman decided he just wanted to fly around the galaxy and use his full heat vision power to core plants as he flew past or someone with the power cosmic thought blowing up civilized worlds (as opposed to scouting them for say Galactus to eat, or becoming a peaceful explorer and philosopher).carlsberg export said:I said harry potter.
don't like the books or films one bit, but 'vegeta' (whoever that is) sounds like something a lady would use to cure a yeast infection.
besides, harry has a little special scar on his head making him ultra special.