Poll: Who would you save ?

[MyNameIsNowNotMyName]

Well, let's see.
I can save the 4 million soldiers, read: combatants, and continue a nuclear war, or I can save the civilians, preserve our society, and start rebuilding and repopulating as soon as possible.

I think I'm going with the latter.

Seems like a very likely scenario, the other country just wanted to nuke you to stop the war, not to completely annihilate you.

 

[Stepan_RUS']

I would certianly save the larger number of soldiers. Why are soldiers considered less-human? are they not simpy civilians with a different job?

I would also like to add, if we are talking about a large ammount of population being killed, i think soldiers are better than civilians. More courageous and masculine, no?

 

[Thyunda]

There is no dog. The scenario stands as presented.

I save the civilians then, as some of them might have dogs.

This answer. This is my answer.


Seriously - still the civilians. What's the point in having soldiers if you're going to sacrifice civilians to protect them?