Okay, gotta pick this apart here.
DAPLR said:
Y'know for every example of love and betrayal, I thought of a perfect example from the prequels. Easy as pie. The betrayal of Anakin to the Jedi, his wife and ultiamtely himself, was portrayed excelently, I really felt like he was torn between his love for Padme and his commitment to his dream of being a Jedi, and all the burdens that come with that dream.
First off, how much did he love Padme? So much that he would never harm her? His almost casual slaying of her does not speak of any deep love, certainly not the kind that would impel him to overturn everything
else he cares about. Dovetailing with my original point, much more screentime is given to the elaborate and overblown lightsaber fight than to this key moment. Heck, as much time is given to him offing Nute Gunray as Padme Amidala.
DAPLR said:
Jango was FFFAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRR more essential to the plot than Boba Fett was in his film than Boba was in his film.. Still cool, but Jango was more fleshed out. I'm presuming were excluding the Expanded Universe which turned Boba into a wholly fleshed out character...
This is true. Boba Fett was an intriguing character
precisely because he wasn't fleshed out. He had only a handful lines of dialogue and exactly one action sequence. Fans loved him because he was mysterious and they wanted more, but mostly because he had a cool helmet.
Yes, Boba Fett is
extensively fleshed out in the Extended Universe. He is now a runaway prince from a world where the national uniform is the Mandalorian armor that he wears. It's called Mandalor. They have a honorable warrior code, a tradition of self-independence, and have retroactively been heavily involved in galactic history for
millenia. It's all very stupid, it erases whatever individuality Boba had, and the Star Wars Universe is worse for it existing.
Jango exists solely as a shrine to Boba. Now, the universe is teeming with Fett clones because Fett DNA is genetically superior to all others. He exists because Boba Fett fans want more and Lucas is foolish enough to cater to them. He was more important to the plot, that's true. But in a story supposedly about Anakin's fall to the Dark Side, why is the plot stretching to give extra screen time to some guy he never meets?
DAPLR said:
You think people would've loved more story on the enslaved Naboo? Don't be naive.
I probably am being a bit naive here. But at least "Episode I: Escape from Naboo" would have a focal point.
DAPLR said:
Look at your precious originals and you'll see a gross step on external drama. The destruction of Leia's home planet, Alderaan. It got Leia to say, 'No' and Ben to flesh out how vast the power of the force stretches out. Thats it. Fucking ridiculous. All of her family and fiends, everything GONE. And all we hear is a no and a sad face.
You're right. Can't argue that. I will point out, though, that the story centers around Luke, which is why his parents get names, dialogue, and screen time. If the story were about Leia, all we'd get is an off-hand mention that his parents were killed by stormtroopers. And a sad face.
DAPLR said:
Fans whine and moan about the new trilogy because thats what they are. New. And something new begets change. And people hate change. So thats why I hate them.
Fair enough. Hating something for being new is bad. I hate the prequels for
not being new enough. Too much is shoehorned in from the later movies. C-3PO and R2-D2 didn't need to be there. Nor did Jango and Boba. Nor did imitation stormtroopers. Tatooine didn't need to visited once, let alone twice. Even the casual lesson Ben gave Luke on the Millenium Falcon is copied. Even the pointless (and baffling) title of Princess for Leia is dragged into this movie because Amidala is a Queen. These movies needed to be doing
anything but parasitizing the originals.
Give me Gray Jedi. Give me Biological Ships. I'll take new Force Powers and traditions other than Jedi and Sith. I like new things and I would've liked to see more of them.