Poll: Why not use benchmark tests instead of demos?

Recommended Videos

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,405
0
0
TrilbyWill said:
Strazdas said:
if any, at least one of them, fail, it shows as a fail.
Yeah. I pretty much always get 'failed' based solely on my video card which, to be fair, isn't that great. But it still works well, which is what I don't understand (in fact, it exceeds the minimum requirements for pretty much every game).
It really just seems to be failing the card purely because it's an integrated card, not because it doesn't work well enough. So, I don't really trust it.
yeah, integrated cards are like no card at all. and most of the cases that is completely true. most integrated cards wont play games. at all. and there is no way for the program to know which integrated card you have. it also looks only at very surface based things (i guess thats fair since system erquirements often limit themselves to that as well). for example i got a 8600M GS. Most games requiring 8000 series wont run on it, its a laptop card and thats ok for it, but the site doesnt care, its 8600 so any game with 8600 passes as sucess.

Eh, it depends on what is defined as hectic fights. Most fights in games aren't all that hectic as they have to run on consoles as well. Spawning in 20 enemies on 2 teams and getting into a massive fight, however, generally will slow down most PCs to a crawl - of course that depends on the game though. A Battlefield or Starcraft type game would do fine, Skyrim would die.
CHA CHA CHA i cant stop laughing. 20 enemies you call a massive fight?
when you got a 100 on 100 we can talk.