Poll: WMDs vs Supersoldiers

[mrhappyface]

Supersoldiers: You played them, you killed them. You commanded them, you shelled them. You died as one, you teabagged one. The list goes on and on.
WMDs: You anthraxed, gassed, nuked, ion cannoned, and infected practically every nation in the world. And you were on the receiving end too!
So which do you prefer to bring along side with you if you could only have one or another during a world war?

 

[Valate_v1legacy]

Supersoldiers. Less civilian casualties.

 

[sms_117b]

I prefer WMD's, less casualties for me!

 

[Katherine Kerensky]

Supersoldiers. Less civilian casualties.

This.

and also the fact that you need the grunts to hold ground you capture.
and all the better if they are SuperGrunts.

 

[veloper]

supersoldiers

Nukes make your conquests worthless. On the defensive, nukes on your own turf is even worse.

 

[Dragon_of_red]

Well, since i can only have one Supersoldier in the OP, then im going with WMD.

But i would choose the supersoldiers if i got heaps of them, they can protect your base and attack at the same time, WMD cant do that.

 

[Carbonic Penguin]

Neither really, since nukes destroy the land with radiation and super soldiers always turn out bad... usually destroys their mind and stuff like in Fallout and Metroid Prime. The only game I've played where supersoldiers didn't have a bad side effect was Prototype... but if I had to chose... supersoldiers!

 

[T5seconds]

Neither really, since nukes destroy the land with radiation and super soldiers always turn out bad... usually destroys their mind and stuff like in Fallout and Metroid Prime. The only game I've played where supersoldiers didn't have a bad side effect was Prototype... but if I had to chose... supersoldiers!

Trust me if the mother fucking super soldier was Alex Mercer hands down I would pick super soldiers...

 

[MazzaTheFirst]

How about Supersoldiers wielding WMD's? Double trouble right there.

 

[Dys]

Supersoldiers. Less civilian casualties.

This, far less collateral damage and what damage there is can be repaired far easier.

 

[Rolling Thunder]

I see your supersoldiers and I raise you the SAS.

 

[The Maddest March Hare]

WMDs. It's probably a lot safer than super soldier projects, they never turn out right. Less civilian casualties that way.

 

[Unknower]

How about Supersoldiers wielding WMD's? Double trouble right there.

Supersoldiers. Less civilian casualties.

This, far less collateral damage and what damage there is can be repaired far easier.

BORING.