Poll: World Domination

Recommended Videos

mayney93

New member
Aug 3, 2009
718
0
0
George144 said:
If America hadn't had a tantrum back when it was young then Britain could have overpowered Spain and France, then controlled all of Europe (preventing both world wars.) Then taken over Asia then gone on to have united the world in a golden age of civilisation and fine moustaches.

In short its all the yanks fault.
yes the yanks are the problem today too
 

Nickolai77

New member
Apr 3, 2009
2,843
0
0
A federal world government (Perhaps something like the United Federal States of Earth) seems like a fundamentally good idea. It would mean that international co-operation be a lot easier, the planets resources can be used and directed towards big projects like colonisation of the Moon or Mars. It also seriously reduces the chances of war, and any radical dissadent organisations can be easily crushed (Imagine the Taliban V The World. A unified world government would mean that resources can be more fairly distributed, energy can be shared, easier to hunt down criminals gone into hiding, international trade improves etc.

The fundamental problem is that this requires that nations sacrifice their own political sovereignty to that of the of federation. You only have to look at the unpopularity of the EU to see the problems of uniting countries together. Humans tend to put their nation first before their own species, rather than the other way round and will therefore resent foreigners having a say in their own affairs. The EU is essentially a microcosm of attempting to bring together nations into a union, anyone interested in the concept of a world government should look into the EU to find the sort of problems this causes.

Also, you have other problems like different cultures, most thorny is Islamic Culture, who, due to their religion and Sharia Law, would possibly make it impossible for them to integrate into a sort of world government. Really, it is probably better and easier to bring together nations that share common values and interests. Perhaps the EU, USA, Commonwealth Nation's like Canada and Australia, possibly India and South Africa, Japan and maybe Taiwan and S.Korea could unite.
 

Doctor_Insano

New member
Oct 23, 2009
86
0
0
i am Canadian as well... a worldwide empire: only if i ran it: i would be a most benevolent dictator, prisons would be sealed deathmatch arenas where they would believe that the lone survivor would be released... haha as if...

peace would coma about after all the "bad people" have been dealt with... you can't make an omelet without shooting a few people
 

Kazturkey

New member
Mar 1, 2009
309
0
0
IckleMissMayhem said:
Kazturkey said:
The brits couldn't even keep full control over as small an island as Ireland. They were cut to bits by the IRA and had to leave.

Tiocfaidh ar la!
NATO's made a huge mess of Iraq and Afghanistan(twice!), and the French and Spanish between then can't sort out ETA. What's your point?!
That the brits never had a chance at world domination because they couldnt keep control over a very small island.
 

Skeleon

New member
Nov 2, 2007
5,409
0
0
It might, but only if you don't mean a dictatorship by empire (i.e. with an emperor) like you stated in your OP. Dictatorships never work for long but a democratic global state could be more durable. Sure. The UN could do it.
This whole "benign dictator"-idea is very short-sighted, though.
 

ForgetRealism09

New member
May 25, 2009
139
0
0
The thing about world domination is people like their freedom. So if someone wants to control the whole world, expect about 6 billion people to not like it. The concept just doesn't work, which I hate to admit after spending all that time dreaming of being Queen of Earth and planning how to organise humanity.