Actually, I had no problems getting or maintaining an erection back when I had a penis. It was slightly less erect and slightly less persistent but it certainly was uncomfortable enough when tucking and being horny. I would have preferred to not have it as it weirded me out a fair bit. Reminds me, I was supposed to get my testosterone back when I went off my hormones for my operation, didn't happen. Seems like my body does nothing the way it is supposed to.MarsAtlas said:Cis women can produce testosterone, but generally not enough testosterone on a consistent basis to get and maintain an erection, but regardless, well, they don't have phalluses to get erect in the first place[footnote]Unless they get a fuckton of testosterone in their body, but thats a whole different tangent and thats not really functional for penetrative purposes. Basically the clitoris elongates, happens sometimes to trans men taking testosterone and cis women using testosterone aids, typically steroids, to build muscle. Its not really usable for penetrative intercourse though.[/footnote]. Trans women, due to the use of testosterone blockers, actually often have less testosterone in their bodies than cis women do, so its more or less impossible without the aids unless they choose to stop using their testosterone blocker days, if not weeks in advance, and thats only if they still have their testes.VanQ said:Women naturally produce testosterone in their bodies. It is produced in their ovaries and is necessary for them to both function in day to day life and to be able to give birth to male children. So theoretically it is possible for a woman to produce enough testosterone to have an erection.
I didn't know there was a difference. In Dutch the word for gender "geslacht" is also used to refer to sex (but not for intercourse which is "seks") and we say "geslachtsveranderingoperatie" instead of sex change operation.likalaruku said:I'm sure I'm not the only one to point this out....
Seeing as I'm a tomboy & don't like girly things or get along well with other women, I could do fine with a sex change, if that's what you were asking.
Yes, it's called surrogacy, a third party carries the child to term but is not it's biological parent. they generally use In vitro fertilisation to conceive the child but the embryo/s are implanted not in to the mother but the surrogate.FirstNameLastName said:I'm not very knowledgeable about that sort of thing. Is there a way for a female to have a biological child without it growing inside her?MarsAtlas said:Actually because egg donation comes with health risks, they're far less common, increasing their overall value and making egg donation somewhat lucrative.FirstNameLastName said:But being female basically answers the question for me, and the answer is "no fucking way".
I'd extend the period a bit.CpT_x_Killsteal said:Temporarily.
Just long enough to masturbate.
Also lesbians.
How would you get pregnant, go through the entire pregnancy, and give birth in 30 days?Rabbitboy said:...and possibly giving birth to a child.
You would give birth after 9 months if you haven't changed back obviously.Ihateregistering1 said:How would you get pregnant, go through the entire pregnancy, and give birth in 30 days?Rabbitboy said:...and possibly giving birth to a child.