It's cheating if you are using more than one person, or robot to look for them, because the fun is you being alone and finding hidden things. The game loses playability if the odds are stacked in your favor.
Poll: Would you consider this cheating?
- Thread starter New Troll
- Start date
Recommended Videos
I'm not sure riding C'Thulu would give any sort of real advantage though. Sure you would have more eyes for looking with, but you would also be much further from the hidey holes to peer into them. I would think just having a tracking dog would be much better. But then would you consider using the canine to do the tracking for you as cheating?Whateveralot said:
I've noticed laziness mentioned more than once. Couldn't it be argued the seeker spent a lot of time learning the skills to create such robots? That definitely would not be lazy of them. So does laziness in game dictate laziness of character? Or should their past achievements give them special bonuses over the other players during the game?-Ezio- said:
Of course it gives you an advantage. It does so because it's awesome. And so isn't a canine. It'd only give the players a new level of awesome. Imagine hide and seek with a dog against Bear Grylls. He'd know what to do.New Troll said:
Fairly certain it's more of a morality, fairness, issue. Rules may not specificly dictate an answer, but in the minds of the majority of the players it's unfair. Hence being referred to as cheating.Dr. Danger said:
If you were a fellow player and you really wanted to win for whatever reason, how would it make you feel to lose due to such tactics? Granted, if you're also using such tactics, then I guess the argument would be moot.