There's the thing, would all sexual couples be alright with open relationships? Everyone is different, so I can only respond with my experiences and/or feelings. I dare not presume to talk for others.Baneat said:My question is: would all asexuals have a problem with this? I don't personally have a problem with multiple sexual partners in romantic relationships, as long as the deciding vote was given to the non-sleeping-around partner, and they are fully clued in as to what's going on.Yo-Antitonic said:Hi, how's it going?Baneat said:Any asexuals who would have no problem with allowing their life-partner or w.e the hell you'd call it have sex with others to meet a physical need here?
In this theoretical relationship, I'd understand that they wouldn't be getting what they wanted, so I'd encourage them to seek solace elsewhere.
However, as an aromantic asexual, I don't feel the need to be that close to people anyway. So yeah, there's that.
As a bisexual pro-romantic (eh? doesn't matter), I can only project my own ideas into asexuals, which is of course a terrible way to do things.
So, I need real asexuals up in dis tread, cause I'm intrigued to know if all asexuals would conclude the same way as you and monkfish (ie won't compromise physical to maintain the emotional), or follow my lines of reasoning.
Oh monkfish I apologize for the expression in that post, I realised it was a little clumsy and could convey that message - it was not intended.
As I said: personally, I wouldn't feel close enough to anyone (excluding obvious familiarial ties) to be considered "in a relationship". BUT if I ever did, I think I'd be alright with them seeking a sexual partner outside of the relationship. Obviously, I can't say for sure, not being in that situation, but I can hazard a pretty good guess.