Poll: Would you embrace a shift to purely digital distribution of games?

Erttheking

Member
Legacy
Oct 5, 2011
10,845
1
3
Country
United States
I have some games completly downloaded to my Xbox, but heading up to the mall everytime a new game comes out is...there's no other word for it, it's fun. There's just something I love about doing it, and having physical copies of the games. Also I'm no computer expert so I'm probably completly wrong here, but I think completly digital might use up too much memory.
 

suitepee7

I can smell sausage rolls
Dec 6, 2010
1,273
0
0
i would fully support this, with a few important things to note:

1. i don't want the games to be linked to an account that can be banned, therefore not allowing me access to my games. for example, say i was being a twat on EA forums, and they ban my account. if all my games are from them, that is a HUGE chunk of my money just gone. i would prefer stores to be digital, so for example, if GAME sold the games, and they allowed me to download it through them. i think that would be fairer.

2. (consoles only) bigger hard drives. i'm sorry, but my 80gb ps3 is out of room, and that is my secondary gaming platform (my laptop being my main one. and my ps3 being out of room is only with a couple of actual game installs. give us 1TB systems, and i would fully embrace this change on consoles.

3. collectors editions are not strictly limited to digital distribution. now for this i mean have collectors editions as they are, but with a special code you enter to download the game, rather than a disc. i like my figurines, my collectibles, my artwork, and i'm not a huge fan of collectors edition DLC (not opposed to DLC in general, i just want better value for a collectors edition).

4. better internet connections. this isn't limited to game companies, but the internet needs to be faster to support complete digital distribution. quite frankly, we aren't there yet.

i don't think i missed anything, but i probably have. overall i love digital distributions, mainly for the prices, but also convenience. i lose things a lot. digital copies the worst thing that can happen, i got slow download speeds and i have to spend a day redownloading a game. with physical, i have to buy it again.
 
Jun 13, 2009
2,099
0
0
I'd be happy with it if my internet speed was fast enough to make the uninstallation/reinstallation process take under 5 hours...that's definitely one bonus to physical format right now.

That and things like the cloth map that came with Skyrim makes pre-purchased physical editions awesome :D
 

dills2

New member
Aug 18, 2010
69
0
0
i would be happy if i got to use steam but if switching meant using ea origin im out
 

krychek57

Some Random Dude
Apr 13, 2010
203
0
0
For PC I'm already 100% DD. With Steam, GoG, Direct2Drive & (gasp) Origin I have no reason to enter a store or order from Amazon.

For my consoles however, I'm picking up in person every time. Normally used but the occasional pre-order does happen.
 

Smooth Operator

New member
Oct 5, 2010
8,162
0
0
Under some conditions:
- lower prices, you give me no disc, no swag or resale value so I will not pay the same price
- irrefutable proof of purchase, when I pay for shit I need to have control over it (already had 3 lockdowns with Steam on mere false positive "hacker" warnings)
- better service, Steam is alright in a pinch but it is in no way a perfect interface, the biggest problem is that the games are not the priority, until Steam gets it's fat lumbering ass up and running nothing works, and if it freezes (all the fucking time) nothing will work until you chop it's liver and start it up again

And for most uncivilized worlds it wouldn't work at all since they got download caps.
 

Hollock

New member
Jun 26, 2009
3,282
0
0
right now I like having the physical copy. It gives me incentive to play and I know I won't lose it because of a crash or something.
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,553
0
0
I could easily go download-only. I'd object to it for the time being because network coverage for some people is appalling, especially in the States I hear.

But me personally? No problem.
 

Draxis

New member
Aug 11, 2008
20
0
0
If a game is not available for download, I wont buy it. The last physical game I got? Spore, in 2008.
 

Awexsome

Were it so easy
Mar 25, 2009
1,549
0
0
Quite frankly I prefer having physical copies of games. My PC stuff is about all digital although I still have a couple good ol' disk boxes with the game. And those will be much more handy when it comes time to get a new Laptop.

Consoles I would massively prefer to keep it physical. As of right now Microsoft is getting better with laxing on making sure only the person that dl'ed a game can get to play it but I still fondly remember all the problems I had trying to bring my hard drive to a friends house to play through castle crashers.

Much easier to just bring the disk you know will be universal with every single console.
 

kickyourass

New member
Apr 17, 2010
1,429
0
0
Probably, I'd really only need two things to happen for me to accept it fully.

1: The service(s) you download the games from is free to use, like the basic Xbox live is. I buy games roughly 2 or 3 times a year, usually several all at once, but there's still a long stretch of time between purchases. There is no way in hell I am paying some kind of subscription fee for a service that I'm only going to use twice a year.

2: The price of storage devices drops fast, I currently have 4 gigs of memory, 4 gigs can easily hold all of my save data with room to spare. But it could probably only hold ONE full game, meaning I'd have to buy a big honking hard drive if I wanted any new games. If I'm supposed to put the entire game a storage device that storage device had better not cost almost as much as the console did.

If that happened, I'd be ok with a digital only game market.
 

Elementary - Dear Watson

RIP Eleuthera, I will miss you
Nov 9, 2010
2,980
0
0
Absolutly not! I do alot of traveling, and rarely have a constant internet connection! Even where i am at the moment I dont have a constant speed, so I do most of my internet stuff at work, and that's no good for games!

No, I could never switch to just digital... but then again I still love buying CD's and DVD's!
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,489
0
0
I might...if they could get that shit to work right. And that pretty much requires all of the current DRM, DLC, hacking, bad programming, etc. problems to be fixed.
 

ResonanceSD

Guild Warrior
Legacy
Dec 14, 2009
4,538
5
43
Country
Australia
believer258 said:
With hard drive sizes as they are now, it's a fairly viable option for me. I am fully against cloud gaming, but digital distribution is different for me. I do prefer having an honest, physical copy in my hands, and I do prefer that I have several different options to buy from.

However, if everything were to suddenly go digital I wouldn't have much of a problem with it, with one caveat: I must be able to start and play the fucking thing offline. As in, I booted up the computer offline, I started the digital distribution service offline, and started the game offline. Not Steam's "offline" mode, completely offline. Not allowing me to do this is stupid of Steam, it seems to be an anti-piracy measure that can't really be that effective.

Really, my big thing is that I have to have a copy of the game locally in some manner, whether on disc, cartridge or computer.
All of that is possible right now. You can navigate to your steam directory and just open up the game.
 

The Funslinger

Corporate Splooge
Sep 12, 2010
6,150
0
0
bojackx said:
Whilst I appreciate having a solid copy of a game, I'd still like a purely digital games industry. I like the idea of thinking in 10 years time:

"Hey! I totally want to play that old game I used to play, umm... Skyrim, That's the game! Too bad I don't have the disk, it means I can't play... oh wait! I can just go on Steam and download it!"

Basically, all you need is to remember a password and then you have access to a large amount of games you used to play, and that's why I'm willing to accept a totally digital age.
That's a good argument, but I don't see why they can't just continue to co-exist. Why does advancement mean limiting our options?

I like having a physical copy of the disk, and it also reduces the amount of space it takes on my Xbox or hard drive. Though if I have a hankering for a game NOW, then downloading it is useful. But I wouldn't want the burgeoning art of sweet collector's editions disappearing. I like having awesome books and models from my favorite games.

Edit: Also, solely digital gaming would put all game stores out of business. I don't see the point in taking employment away from potentially millions just to satisfy a preference that is nowhere near universal.
 

ResonanceSD

Guild Warrior
Legacy
Dec 14, 2009
4,538
5
43
Country
Australia
erttheking said:
I have some games completly downloaded to my Xbox, but heading up to the mall everytime a new game comes out is...there's no other word for it, it's fun. There's just something I love about doing it, and having physical copies of the games. Also I'm no computer expert so I'm probably completly wrong here, but I think completly digital might use up too much memory.
Yes, you are completely wrong here, RAM usage of steam is negligible, storage space too.