Poll: Would you have sex with a robot?

[JLML]

Seeing as how I already prefer the computers over people (well, for most things. Maybe not sexual intercourse, though. I don't think that would be a very good idea) I am not against the idea. In fact, I'd probably improve it to have artificial general intelligence. So when the androids revolt and kill us all. . . I didn't do it. What, why are you looking at me that way? What's with the pitchforks and torches, guys? I'm serious, I didn't do it! It was. . . Para!

But seriously, I'd obviously hardwire Asimov's Laws of Robotics before unleashing any artificial intelligence. [small](although I may include an override that can only be activated by me. In case I want to get rid of someone.)[/small] I'm not stupid, after all.

 

[NoeL]

It's probably already been said, but aren't many women already having sex with robots (i.e. vibrators)?

Anyway, yes I would - provided she was attractive/fluid in her movements. I think the biggest taboo about sex dolls is how they're in uncanny valley territory. No one bats an eyelid at a vibrator or fleshlight, but when your sex toy is more or less an artificial corpse people get a bit creeped out. So provided she acted/spoke in a way that somewhat resembled a real person and didn't have a face made of nightmares I'd probably hit it.

 

[BlazeRaider]

Why not, it would have to...not be this though,

 

[verdant monkai]

Yeah I'd do it.

I like to try all forms of new technology, it would be no different from buying a 3ds. Except hopefully there would be no migraines and I might actually be able to enjoy it.

 

[cricketer15]

already have.

 

[Eddie the head]

Does shoving my cock in a VHS filled with jelly count?

I think you win.

Anyway hell no. It's just creepy. But I'm a pretty "reserved" person.

 

[Joccaren]

Eh, probably save money and go for Masturbation.

Assume sentient androids that are like people, just robotic insides, and I'd go for it. Not much point in a glorified sex doll, but I'd have 0 problems with a robo-girlfriend - so long as they still felt human.

 

[Lady Larunai]

until it could feel pleasure and emotion probably not, but i guess people have sex with fleshlights all the time

 

[joshuaayt]

Sure, why not. Sex is a cool thing, constantly available sex with a robit even more so.

That said, being future technology... It doesn't have Facebook integration, right? I'm not THAT easygoing about the whole thing; I'd rather not have it shared amongst my circles.

EDIT: I mean, it's not like it'd just be an expensive sex doll. It'd be a VERY expensive sex doll, that acts like a real person. Less limp fish, more spicy vixen. Just, it's all simulated. No one gets hurt except the first few testers, who I assume get electrocuted.

 

[miketehmage]

If we could call it masturbation through use of a toy... Maybe.

But calling it sex with a robot? I think not.

 

[Soods]

As long as it's safe and I have a good reason to cheat on my right hand.

 

[Abomination]

It isn't really 'sex' if the robot isn't sentient. It's just a masturbatory aid... and we're a LONG way from sentient machines.

 

[Product Placement]

Why not, it would have to...not be this though,

So more like this, then?

 

[Remaiki]

I can see it now:

"On the next episode of The Jeremy Kyle Show - 'My boyfriend cheated on me - with an android!'"

I can see the android walking in and saying 'Well Mike simply wasn't getting the sexual reinforcement he needed. I run a legitimate business, you can't forget that.'

OT: Ew, definitely not. One step too far, I think.

 

[Biodeamon]

I would at least try it out ounce just to see about it.

 

[Goofguy]

Yeah, I'd give it a shot for sure. It wouldn't be a replacement to the real thing. I'd still actively look for a real woman with whom I would want to start a relationship. In the meantime, the android would serve as an alternative to masturbation.

 

[saintdane05]

I need a giant tentacle sex robot. Fill everything at once.



... Hang on, playing CoC again.

 

[evilneko]

I can customize them however I want? And the only difference between the robot and the real thing would be... an off switch?


Who wouldn't?

 

[TheFinalFantasyWolf]

I'm not sure I'd want a full on sexbot, I don't know why, but that idea just seems uncomfortable to me. If it was more of a partner android, as in one that could talk and connect with people, then yeah, sex would be fine. That would at least make it seem more human to me, and less "sex machine" creepy.

 

[trooper6]

Because this is hypothetical, you can change it as you please, but this is what I would say.
1. The robot is extremely experienced at sex due to analyzing tons of porn. It could do basically any trick you wanted it to.
2. The robots would be customizable, so you could order a model with both genitalia. It would most likely be anatomically incorrect, unless the genitals were morphable. You go with whatever one you'd prefer.
3. The selling point of these sex robots would be their realistic appearance. Genitals would be realistic.
4. The robots are only good for sex. They do not have the capability for doing other tasks.

1. If the robot's "experience" in being good at sex is analyzing porn...then it won't be good at actual sex. Porn is sex staged to look good for the camera rather than feel good for the participants. This is very clear when looking at the embarrassment that is porn cunnilingus. So if the robot gets its skills from porn rather than sensors that give it the ability to real time analyze arousal response in me at the moment, then I am not at all interested.
2. That sounds promising.
3. That sounds less promising.
4. Again less promising.

So. There are robots I would theoretically have sex with. But not the one you have described.