Ok, purely hypothetical if I were single. It would still be a resounding NO. The uncanny valley of an android sex doll is too damn creepy, probably would send my brain into an anti-android craze/Terminator paranoid psychotic break... Bad things man.
Poll: Would you have sex with a robot?
- Thread starter Epic Bear Man
- Start date
Recommended Videos
MEEEEEEEEHHHHHHH no not really. At least when I masterbate I did it with something organic.
I'd probably end up getting castrated in a horrific accident anyways.
I'd probably end up getting castrated in a horrific accident anyways.
I don't want to have sex with a big expensive toy, but maybe when we're past the future foretold and these androids can actually have feelings and thoughts of there own, maybe, just maybe I'd make some sparks fly.
I know I would only be fulfilling a machines programming and not bringing pleasure to someone I love so... no. Not ever.
I saw the question and immediately said "yes". No hesitation, no questions asked. I'd fuck a robot.
I live a sad, sad life.
Real talk - yeah, I don't see why not. If it's a strictly emotionless automaton then it's just an advanced form of masturbation, and if it's an aware synthetic being then I'd probably date it first.
Mad bonus points if the robot looks like EDI from Mass Effect 3, 'cause DAMN. I love EDI.
I live a sad, sad life.
Real talk - yeah, I don't see why not. If it's a strictly emotionless automaton then it's just an advanced form of masturbation, and if it's an aware synthetic being then I'd probably date it first.
Mad bonus points if the robot looks like EDI from Mass Effect 3, 'cause DAMN. I love EDI.
Seeing how many people end up in the hospital with their dicks wedged between something they have no place being, I shouldn't be as surprised by the amount of yeses as I am.
...nothin' against it, but that's a lot of tech (and space taken up) for a glorified fleshlight. I'd require one with some more sophisticated software that could at least respond somewhat realistically to stimulation/conversation, act as a personal computer and do a few simple repetitive tasks around the house (dusting, for example). An example of such a piece of software in fiction [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SjBlKHV4iQ] (albeit far more sophisticated than I would require... and yes, I'm talking about the one that locks up from the statement of a simple self-referential paradox). A person-sized sexdoll that just waits around in the closet until I want to fuck it seems like a waste to me.
Well, first of all, this
And second, I don't understand why you would specify situation so much. I mean, can't we just fall in love with robot?
And second, I don't understand why you would specify situation so much. I mean, can't we just fall in love with robot?
Sure, why the hell not? I suppose all you who say no because you "must have an emotional connection" don't masturbate either then? Or do you have an emotional connection with your hand?
One question: can I get one in a quadrupedal design, with white fur, a purple curly mane, and three little blue diamonds on its flank?
One question: can I get one in a quadrupedal design, with white fur, a purple curly mane, and three little blue diamonds on its flank?
But a sentient sex slave hanging in there awaiting your pleasure would be totally fine?6th And Silver said:
I'd probably install some kind of software into my sexbot so it had a personality or something that made it seem more real. It would feel inherently wrong to have sex with a robot that doesn't think or feel. Yes, I know it would basically be masturbation 2.0, but if they look that real, I'd want them to act real as well.
I'll address this situation in the future when robots get more real.
I'll address this situation in the future when robots get more real.
On the positive side, it could be a safe alternative to actual prostitutes - I'm guessing robots don't get STDs . On the other hand, however, yeah...creepy as fuck. So, no thanks... I'll pay for sex the way men all over the world have been doing since time immemorial - dinner, movies and jewelry .
. On the other hand, however, yeah...creepy as fuck. So, no thanks... I'll pay for sex the way men all over the world have been doing since time immemorial - dinner, movies and jewelry .
Sex. SEX? Forget that, I'd want a robot wife! Imagine how much time I could save going on countless bad dates when instead I could just program a gynoid with all the personality traits and appearance that I like. Hooey, that'd be a time saver! =D
This kind of argument annoys me. If someone wants to pretend (note: key word here is PRETEND) that they are fucking an under-age partner, why the hell shouldn't they be able to? Someone with an interest in under-age sex could then get their fun without involving an actual kid. I think it ought to be positively encouraged as a way to help reduce the likelihood of real children being molested.Aethren said:
It would be like a prostitute, but less awkward for me. I'd probably buy one if it didn't look too weird.
If I did I would need one that is programed to be more of a living companion that has enough uses outside of sex to remain operational when I finally do find a living girlfriend. Something that I would keep active at all times just for the company. Even then I would only rarely use it for sex.
Hmm... probably. Yeah, I actually reckon I would do that. It would certainly be more active and.. engaging(?) than jerking off to porn all the time. I would never substitute it for the real thing though. While the idea of just having sex with someone without all the other stuff that comes with it is nice, there are things such as fuck buddies and prostitutes that supply that service already.
Still, a neat little invention, to be sure.
EDIT:
Still, a neat little invention, to be sure.
EDIT:
Well, to be fair man, I find that less disturbing than progressive. I don't know effective it would be, but it could be a possible deterrent for peadophilia. If they could release their sexual needs on a doll that resembles a child, well no one gets harmed. It'd be a much better alternative to them going out and actually doing it to.. well, you know. It might be completely flawed, but it is an idea.Dimitriov said:How about this for disturbing?
