It's no secret Activision want subscription fees for COD. The analysts think it's inevitable and the user-base is certainly there for them to give it a go.
The question is: Would you pay any sort of subscription for COD? For arguements sake, let's say that a 'reasonable' price is similar to that of an MMO. Around $13 a month.
Let's also say that an 'inexpensive price' means somewhere around $7 a month.
For arguements sake, we'll say that the COD multiplayer is expanded to include tournaments, more playlists and content updates (new perks, weapons, killstreaks, maps.)
What would you do? Would you validate this kind of business strategy, potentially giving other developers the 'ok' to do a similar thing because the price is worth the entertainment? Or would you prefer not to ecourage such a venture?
The question is: Would you pay any sort of subscription for COD? For arguements sake, let's say that a 'reasonable' price is similar to that of an MMO. Around $13 a month.
Let's also say that an 'inexpensive price' means somewhere around $7 a month.
For arguements sake, we'll say that the COD multiplayer is expanded to include tournaments, more playlists and content updates (new perks, weapons, killstreaks, maps.)
What would you do? Would you validate this kind of business strategy, potentially giving other developers the 'ok' to do a similar thing because the price is worth the entertainment? Or would you prefer not to ecourage such a venture?