Newslink [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8328820.stm]
Ok, fine, they want to stop illegal file downloads, but don't you feel that this power can be miss-used in the future? Who knows what kind of political situation we might have in say.. 100 years. It'll be too easy to shut an opposition out of the net by saying that they're downloading illegal files (yes, I know I'm thinking very far ahead, but you need big perspectives on things).
Also.. allowing surveillance of a protocol makes it a little to easy to watch other stuff as well. Its like telling a post-man to go through someone's mail and only look for bills - of course he can then "by accident" open something else.
Idea: encrypt your transfers.. and seed encrypted legal files like Linux-distros just to annoy whoever might be watching you.
Edit: please discuss the issue below, I want to know more about what you think.
Ok, fine, they want to stop illegal file downloads, but don't you feel that this power can be miss-used in the future? Who knows what kind of political situation we might have in say.. 100 years. It'll be too easy to shut an opposition out of the net by saying that they're downloading illegal files (yes, I know I'm thinking very far ahead, but you need big perspectives on things).
Also.. allowing surveillance of a protocol makes it a little to easy to watch other stuff as well. Its like telling a post-man to go through someone's mail and only look for bills - of course he can then "by accident" open something else.
Idea: encrypt your transfers.. and seed encrypted legal files like Linux-distros just to annoy whoever might be watching you.
Edit: please discuss the issue below, I want to know more about what you think.