It's also because some things look better on camera than they are in real life, female orgasms aren't as easy to produce in real life as they are in porn, and porn stars tend to be unusually attractive/have done things to themselves to make them more photogenic that not everyone has done in real life (completely shaving body hair, circumcision, etc.) There's a famous quote from some porn director or another: "I'm not paying you to enjoy yourselves, I'm paying you to look like you're enjoying yourselves." It kind of says it all.Altorin said:I made the comment hastily but I didn't quite mean that. All I mean is, it doesn't HAVE to set unreasonable expectations. The argument of "unreasonable expectations" usually comes with the idea that women don't like doing certain things and we should feel bad for wanting them. I just think that argument is bullshit. That's really what I meant, and you might still disagree, but that's a little clarification. Of course someone shouldn't feel like they HAVE to do something, and if someone incorrectly expects you to, I completely think you should tell them to get stuffed. I just don't think "unreasonable expectations" is a very good argument against pornographyVault101 said:that comment kind of bothers me for some reason,Altorin said:- Sets Unrealistic Expectations? So? Porn probably won't make you a great lover, but then, lots of women like porn, and like to be treated just the way the girls in porn do. So maybe your friend just needs to find more interesting women? They're out there. The only real unrealistic expectations I find with porn is based on the fact that porn is meant to be watched. Everything is open, and that's just not how sex works most of the time. Things that are awesome become uncomfortable when you're also having sex with a camera.
)
I dont think somone should feel bad about not being comfortable with certian things, I don't know what goes on in porn but I dont think anyoen should be "expected" to like certain things...
You're clinging on saying that making things illegal won't result on anything. I am saying I don't want more things illegal.TheKasp said:snip
I concur. When you're looking at any sweeping proposition like that, it isn't enough to say "what would happen if we did it?", you have to say "can we do it?", and in the case of pornography, the answer is no. When you try to ban something so ingrained in culture, and something that is so EASY to manufacture, you can't actually do it - at least, not without creating 1984-world, but I think that's going a little far to stop the evils of porn. If you can't effectively ban Alcohol, a substance, or even today, if you can't effectively ban other illegal drugs IN THIS DAY AND AGE, which have to be produced, how can you ban something for which you only need a camera? Wait, never mind, it would be outsourced, and then, assuming the ban withstood the outcry of job loss, it would just be a problem of preventing distribution, which, again, is pretty damn hard.DoPo said:Wow, I do applaud you. That is a perfect way to counter those arguments. You sir win an internetz.LoathsomePete said:Basically the only thing you really need to say is "Hey, remember that time when the United States banned alcohol and nobody ever drank again and there wasn't a total rise in organized crime, corruption, and violence?"